Property Owning Democracies? Home Owner Corporations in Hong Kong

Home ownership comes in a variety of forms. Owners of single-family dwellings generally enjoy a high degree of control and autonomy. Many home owners, however, are in circumstances which involve greater collective interest, medium and high-rise environments and significant state involvement and regulation. In such situations, tensions and conflicts can arise among residents and others stakeholders in relation to a range of management and maintenance issues and between owners and the wider public interest. This involves constraints on individual freedom and the necessity for co-operation. This paper discusses these and related issues with a particular focus on owners' corporations in Hong Kong. In the Hong Kong context, home owners are most typically in large scale, high rise and often technically complex environments. The particular form of the owner corporation is explored in relation to its history of development, its significance in the home ownership sector and its legal structure. Owner corporations raise a number of issues of participation and democracy. These include the anti-democratic organisational arrangement of owners' corporations which tends to limit rather than enhance participation of ordinary owners, the impact of owners' corporations in reinforcing class and income gaps as well as debates on individualism/collectivism and public/private dimensions. In policy terms there are important questions of regulation and the nature of urban management in high rise and high density environments.

[1]  G. Bridge Review of Kemeny,J "From public housing to the social market" , 1996 .

[2]  A. Cuthbert For a Few Dollars More: Urban Planning and the Legitimation Process in Hong Kong , 1991 .

[3]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[4]  Bo Bengtsson Tenants' Dilemma- On Collective Action in Housing , 1998 .

[5]  H. Hansmann Condominium and Cooperative Housing: Transactional Efficiency, Tax Subsidies, and Tenure Choice , 1991, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[6]  P. Saunders A Nation of Home Owners , 1991 .

[7]  Nick Bailey,et al.  Management of flats in multiple ownership: Learning from other countries , 1997 .

[8]  A. Cuthbert A Fistful of Dollars: Legitimation, Production and Debate in Hong Kong , 1991 .

[9]  Hannu Ruonavaara,et al.  Types and forms of housing tenure: Towards solving the comparison/translation problem , 1993 .

[10]  R. Lynd,et al.  Home ownership : is it sound? , 1945 .

[11]  T. Champion Winners and losers: home ownership in modern Britain , 1999 .

[12]  R. Forrest,et al.  Home Ownership: Differentiation and Fragmentation , 1990 .

[13]  J. Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1989 .

[14]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[15]  P. Somerville,et al.  Making sense of tenant participation , 1995 .

[16]  Don Luymes,et al.  PRIVATOPIA: HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS AND THE RISE OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE GOVERNMENT , 1996, Landscape Journal.

[17]  A. Murie Divisions of Homeownership: Housing Tenure and Social Change , 1991 .