Social Network Analysis of the Caste-Based Reservation System in India

It has been argued that the reservation system in India, which has existed since the time of Indian Independence (1947), has caused more havoc and degradation than progress. This being a popular public opinion, has not been based on any rigorous scientific study or research. In this paper, we revisit the cultural divide among the Indian population from a purely social network based approach. We study the distinct cluster formation that takes place in the Indian community and find that this is largely due to the effect of caste-based homophily. To study the impact of the reservation system, we define a new parameter called social distance that represents the social capital associated with each individual in the backward class. We study the changes that take place with regard to the average social distance of a cluster when a new link is established between the clusters which in its essence, is what the reservation system is accomplishing. Our extensive study calls for the change in the mindset of people in India. Although the animosity towards the reservation system could be rooted due to historical influence, hero worship and herd mentality, our results make it clear that the system has had a considerable impact on the country's overall development by bridging the gap between the conflicting social groups. The results also have been verified using the survey and are discussed in the paper.

[1]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Shihe Fu,et al.  Race-Specific Agglomeration Economies: Social Distance and the Black-White Wage Gap , 2013 .

[3]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Preet Rustagi,et al.  Elementary Education in India: Progress, Setbacks, and Challenges , 2010 .

[6]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  A Data-Based Approach to Social Influence Maximization , 2011, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[7]  Susan Bayly,et al.  Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age , 1999 .

[8]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[9]  Akrati Saxena,et al.  Modeling memetics using edge diversity , 2015, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[10]  Deborah G. . Ancona.  Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[11]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Kaivan Munshi,et al.  Strength in Numbers: Networks as a Solution to Occupational Traps , 2011 .

[13]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[14]  N. Christakis.  Social networks and collateral health effects , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Kathleen C. Schwartzman,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 2007 .

[16]  S. Kamat,et al.  Education and Social Equity: With a Special Focus on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Elementary Education. CREATE Pathways to Access. Research Monograph No. 19. , 2008 .

[17]  Robin Wilson,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2013 .

[18]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[19]  K. Arrow,et al.  Limited Network Connections and the Distribution of Wages , 2004 .

[20]  Ruth Mace,et al.  Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Jacob Aikara.  Scheduled castes & higher education : a study of college students in Bombay , 1980 .

[22]  Akrati Saxena,et al.  Understanding spreading patterns on social networks based on network topology , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[23]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[24]  I. Welch.  Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades , 1992 .

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Oliver Mendelsohn,et al.  The Untouchables: Subordination, Poverty and the State in Modern India , 1998 .

[27]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Preface to the Handbook of Economic Growth , 2005 .

[28]  B. Meuleman,et al.  Measuring attitudes and feelings towards discrimination in cross-nation research: lessons learned from the European Social Survey , 2007 .

[29]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Social Structure, Segregation, and Economic Behavior , 2009 .

[30]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Average Distance, Diameter, and Clustering in Social Networks with Homophily , 2008, WINE.

[31]  Vani K. Borooah,et al.  The Effectiveness of Jobs Reservation: Caste, Religion and Economic Status in India , 2007 .

[32]  Binod Khadria,et al.  Human Resources in Science and Technology in India and the International Mobility of Highly Skilled Indians , 2004 .

[33]  S. Kamat,et al.  Education and Social Equity With a Special Focus on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Elementary Education , 2008 .

[34]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Evaluating Health Promotion Programs , 2002 .

[35]  Akrati Saxena,et al.  Evolving models for meso-scale structures , 2015, 2016 8th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS).

[36]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[37]  Karuna Chanana,et al.  Accessing higher education: the dilemma of schooling women, minorities, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in contemporary India , 1993 .

[38]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[40]  Meenakshi Gupta,et al.  Equality through reservations , 1999 .

[41]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  How Homophily Affects Learning and Diffusion in Networks , 2008, 0811.4013.

[42]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[43]  Peter S. Bearman,et al.  Social Structure , Segregation , and Economic Behavior , 2009 .

[44]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Marc Galanter,et al.  Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India , 1984 .

[46]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2002, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[47]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[48]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Social Networks in Determining Employment and Wages: Patterns, Dynamics, and Inequality , 2002 .

[49]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[50]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Network Measures of Social Capital , 2012 .

[51]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers , 2011, Nature.

[52]  P. Aghion,et al.  Handbook of Economic Growth , 2005 .

[53]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The centrality of groups and classes , 1999 .

[54]  Thomas E. Weisskopf.  Impact of Reservation on Admissions to Higher Education in India , 2016 .