Bounding higher‐order ionosphere errors for the dual‐frequency GPS user

[1] Civil signals at L2 and L5 frequencies herald a new phase of Global Positioning System (GPS) performance. Dual-frequency users typically assume a first-order approximation of the ionosphere index of refraction, combining the GPS observables to eliminate most of the ranging delay, on the order of meters, introduced into the pseudoranges. This paper estimates the higher-order group and phase errors that occur from assuming the ordinary first-order dual-frequency ionosphere model using data from the Federal Aviation Administration's Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) network on a solar maximum quiet day and an extremely stormy day postsolar maximum. We find that during active periods, when ionospheric storms may introduce slant range delays at L1 as high as 100 m, the higher-order group errors in the L1–L2 or L1–L5 dual-frequency combination can be tens of centimeters. The group and phase errors are no longer equal and opposite, so these errors accumulate in carrier smoothing of the dual-frequency code observable. We show the errors in the carrier-smoothed code are due to higher-order group errors and, to a lesser extent, to higher-order phase rate errors. For many applications, this residual error is sufficiently small as to be neglected. However, such errors can impact geodetic applications as well as the error budgets of GPS Augmentation Systems providing Category III precision approach.

[1]  W. Ross Second-order effects in high-frequency transionospheric propagation. , 1965 .

[2]  George A. Hajj,et al.  Higher-Order Ionospheric Effects on the GPS Observables and Means of Modeling Them , 1993 .

[3]  Thomas F. Tascione,et al.  Introduction to the space environment , 1988 .

[4]  Per K. Enge,et al.  Global positioning system: signals, measurements, and performance [Book Review] , 2002, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[5]  Wallace H. Campbell,et al.  Geomagnetic storms, the Dst ring-current myth and lognormal distributions , 1996 .

[6]  Martin Walt Introduction to Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation: Preface , 1994 .

[7]  J. Bittencourt Fundamentals of plasma physics , 1986 .

[8]  A. Komjathy,et al.  Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29–30, 2003 “Halloween Storms” , 2005 .

[9]  M. Hernández‐Pajares,et al.  Second-order ionospheric term in GPS : Implementation and impact on geodetic estimates , 2007 .

[10]  Susan Macmillan,et al.  10th Generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field , 2005 .

[11]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions , 2003 .

[12]  R. Leitinger,et al.  Range errors due to ionospheric and tropospheric effects for signal frequencies above 100 MHz , 1984 .

[13]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  Automated daily processing of more than 1000 ground‐based GPS receivers for studying intense ionospheric storms , 2005 .

[14]  S. Bassiri Three-Frequency Ranging Systems and Their Applications to Ionospheric Delay Calibration , 1990 .

[15]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Impact of higher‐order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates , 2005 .

[16]  B. M. Fannin,et al.  Analysis of ionospheric contributions to the Doppler shift of CW signals from artificial Earth satellites , 1968 .

[17]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[18]  Bodo W. Reinisch,et al.  International Reference Ionosphere 2000 , 2001 .

[19]  Per Enge,et al.  The Effects of Large Ionospheric Gradients on Single Frequency Airborne Smoothing Filters for WAAS and LAAS , 2004 .