Measuring magnitude of change by high-rise buildings in visual amenity conflicts in Brisbane

Abstract Development conflicts signal underlying forces, challenges and processes in the evolution of urban environments. The review of 13 years of Planning and Environment Court cases in Brisbane revealed a high occurrence of visual amenity issues related to bulk, height and scale of high-rise buildings in medium and high-density areas. In these conflicts, justification of building height, bulk and visual relationships are mixed with expert witness personal judgments due to inefficiencies of conventional photomontage simulations and lack of scientific and measurable methods to assess visual impacts. A quantitative approach offers a new method for the evaluation of new building heights in the existing context. Using this method, the extent of visibility of a public vantage viewpoint is modelled in 3D and projected in a 2D graph by calculating sightline vertical and horizontal angles and distances. The projected 2D graph provides a basis to quantify visual impacts that can be experienced in a 360-degree context and 124-degree field of views. The extent of change is calculated based on the area of visible built form in an unwrapped plot of the surrounding skyline. The proposed method provides a measurable tool to increase the certainty and reliability of expert judgments in assessing visual impacts resulting from planned high-rise buildings.

[1]  Jan Ketil Rød,et al.  Visibility and Dominance Analysis: Assessing a High-Rise Building Project in Trondheim , 2009 .

[2]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  Public Places - Urban Spaces : the dimensions of urban design, Second Edition , 2003 .

[3]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment , 2000 .

[4]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[5]  Kim-hung Kwong,et al.  Assessing the Applicability and Effectiveness of 3D Visualisation in Environmental Impact Assessment , 2010 .

[6]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Enclosure and Safety in Urbanscapes , 2005 .

[7]  Graham H. May.  The future of the city , 1990 .

[8]  Hui Lin,et al.  Three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation for urban open spaces aided by Google SketchUp and WebGIS , 2017 .

[9]  S. Willey.  Are planning appeal rights necessary? A comparative study of Australia, England and Vancouver BC , 2005 .

[10]  Michael Burt,et al.  A 3-D Visual Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments , 2003 .

[11]  V. Colic‐Peisker,et al.  Resident third party objections and appeals against planning applications: implications for higher density and social housing , 2012 .

[12]  A. Stamps.  Entropy, Visual Diversity, and Preference , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[13]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  VISUAL THRESHOLDS FOR DETECTION, RECOGNITION AND VISUAL IMPACT IN LANDSCAPE SETTINGS , 2000 .

[14]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Environmental Enclosure in Urban Settings , 2002 .

[15]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Understanding Tall Buildings: A Theory of Placemaking , 2017 .

[16]  Jacques Teller,et al.  A Spherical Metric for the Field-Oriented Analysis of Complex Urban Open Spaces , 2003 .

[17]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  The implications for visual simulation and analysis of temporal variation in the visibility of wind turbines , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[18]  J. Palmer.  The contribution of key observation point evaluation to a scientifically rigorous approach to visual impact assessment , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[19]  Laurie Buys,et al.  Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours , 2012 .

[20]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies , 2015 .

[21]  M bin Ninsalam,et al.  Interrogating Urban Renewal Scenarios Using Skyline Analysis in Fishermans Bend, Melbourne , 2018 .

[22]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables , 2007 .

[23]  Robert W. Wassmer.  Why Not in My Backyard? Neighborhood Impacts of Deconcentrating Assisted Housing: George C. Galster, Peter A. Tatian, Anna M. Santiago, Kathryn L.S. Pettit, Robin E. Smith, Center for Urban Policy Research, 2003 , 2004 .

[24]  S. Willey.  Planning Appeals: Are Third Party Rights Legitimate? The Case Study of Victoria, Australia , 2006 .

[25]  G. Guthey,et al.  Place and Sense of Place , 2014 .

[26]  Gülen Çağdaş,et al.  Tailoring a geomodel for analyzing an urban skyline , 2012 .

[27]  Stephan K. Chalup,et al.  A Computational Approach to Fractal Analysis of a Cityscape's Skyline , 2009 .

[28]  B. Badcock,et al.  Home Truths: Property Ownership and Housing Wealth in Australia , 1996 .

[29]  J. Snyder.  Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections , 1994 .

[30]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  A Digital Image of the City: 3D Isovists in Lynch's Urban Analysis , 2009 .

[31]  G. Shen,et al.  A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal , 2014 .

[32]  K. Dovey,et al.  A Test of Character: Regulating Place-identity in Inner-city Melbourne , 2009 .

[33]  Perry Pei-Ju Yang,et al.  Viewsphere: A GIS-Based 3D Visibility Analysis for Urban Design Evaluation , 2007 .

[34]  Arthur E. Stamps.  A paradigm for distinguishing significant from nonsignificant visual impacts: Theory, implementation, case histories , 1997 .

[35]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty , 2002 .

[36]  Julius Panero Martin Zelnik,et al.  Human Dimension & Interior Space: A Source Book of Design Reference Standards , 1979 .

[37]  John Zacharias,et al.  Preferences for view corridors through the urban environment , 1999 .

[38]  Mehrdad Karimimoshaver,et al.  A framework for assessing tall buildings' impact on the city skyline: Aesthetic, visibility, and meaning dimensions , 2018, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[39]  Michael J. Meitner,et al.  A route-based visibility analysis for landscape management , 2013 .

[40]  Tom Heath,et al.  Tall Buildings and the Urban Skyline , 2000 .

[41]  Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman,et al.  Integrating ‘weighted views’ to quantitative 3D visibility analysis as a predictive tool for perception of space , 2018 .

[42]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  Landscape Visibility Computation: Necessary, but Not Sufficient , 2003 .

[43]  S. Willey.  The merits of merit-based planning appeals: observations from Australia , 2004 .