The Effects of Dimensionality on Equating the Law School Admission Test

Using factor analysis, we conducted an assessment of multidimensionality for 6 forms of the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) and found 2 subgroups of items or factors for each of the 6 forms. The main conclusion of the factor analysis component of this study was that the LSAT appears to measure 2 different reasoning abilities: inductive and deductive. The technique of N. J. Dorans & N. M. Kingston (1985) was used to examine the effect of dimensionality on equating. We began by calibrating (with item response theory [IRT] methods) all items on a form to obtain Set I of estimated IRT item parameters. Next, the test was divided into 2 homogeneous subgroups of items, each having been determined to represent a different ability (i.e., inductive or deductive reasoning). The items within these subgroups were then recalibrated separately to obtain item parameter estimates, and then combined into Set II. The estimated item parameters and true-score equating tables for Sets I and II corresponded closely.

[1]  G. M. Tallis.  The Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Correlation from Contingency Tables , 1962 .

[2]  R. Hambleton.  Principles and selected applications of item response theory. , 1989 .

[3]  Rebecca Zwick,et al.  Assessing the Dimensionality of NAEP Reading Data , 1987 .

[4]  R. Linn.  Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[5]  E. Muraki,et al.  Full-Information Item Factor Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  M. Reckase.  Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and Implications , 1979 .

[7]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Developing a Common Metric in Item Response Theory , 1983 .

[8]  William Stout,et al.  A New Item Response Theory Modeling Approach with Applications to Unidimensionality Assessment and Ability Estimation , 1990 .

[9]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[10]  Neil J. Dorans,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF VIOLATIONS OF UNIDIMENSIONALITY ON THE ESTIMATION OF ITEM AND ABILITY PARAMETERS AND ON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY EQUATING OF THE GRE VERBAL SCALE , 1985 .

[11]  Roderick P. McDonald,et al.  The dimensionality of tests and items , 1981 .

[12]  William Stout,et al.  A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality , 1987 .

[13]  P. Rosenbaum.  Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory , 1984 .

[14]  Ratna Nandakumar,et al.  Traditional Dimensionality Versus Essential Dimensionality , 1991 .

[15]  S. Mulaik,et al.  Foundations of Factor Analysis , 1975 .

[16]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests , 1945 .

[17]  J. Guilford.  The difficulty of a test and its factor composition , 1941 .