Value of dynamic clinical and biomarker data for mortality risk prediction in COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

Objectives Being able to predict which patients with COVID-19 are going to deteriorate is important to help identify patients for clinical and research practice. Clinical prediction models play a critical role in this process, but current models are of limited value because they are typically restricted to baseline predictors and do not always use contemporary statistical methods. We sought to explore the benefits of incorporating dynamic changes in routinely measured biomarkers, non-linear effects and applying ‘state-of-the-art’ statistical methods in the development of a prognostic model to predict death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Design The data were analysed from admissions with COVID-19 to three hospital sites. Exploratory data analysis included a graphical approach to partial correlations. Dynamic biomarkers were considered up to 5 days following admission rather than depending solely on baseline or single time-point data. Marked departures from linear effects of covariates were identified by employing smoothing splines within a generalised additive modelling framework. Setting 3 secondary and tertiary level centres in Greater Manchester, the UK. Participants 392 hospitalised patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Results 392 patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis were identified. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.73 using admission data alone to 0.75 when also considering results of baseline blood samples and to 0.83 when considering dynamic values of routinely collected markers. There was clear non-linearity in the association of age with patient outcome. Conclusions This study shows that clinical prediction models to predict death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 can be improved by taking into account both non-linear effects in covariates such as age and dynamic changes in values of biomarkers.

[1]  Miriã Cândida Oliveira,et al.  International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC). A new collaborative global platform for global clinical trials targeting post-COVID19 patients. , 2022, Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal.

[2]  L. Marsh,et al.  500 The Four Year Clinical and Economic Impact of an Extended Screening Program for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Cardiff and Vale University Health Board , 2021, British Journal of Surgery.

[3]  D. Brough,et al.  Anakinra in COVID-19: important considerations for clinical trials , 2020, The Lancet Rheumatology.

[4]  C. Zheng,et al.  Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a case-control study , 2020, International journal of medical sciences.

[5]  W. Liang,et al.  Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China , 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[6]  Cheng Wan,et al.  Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China , 2020, Kidney International.

[7]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal , 2020, BMJ.

[8]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Lei Dong,et al.  Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Kidney International.

[10]  Qiurong Ruan,et al.  Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China , 2020, Intensive Care Medicine.

[11]  J. Xiang,et al.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study , 2020, The Lancet.

[12]  Y. Hu,et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China , 2020, The Lancet.

[13]  Danping Liu,et al.  Combination of longitudinal biomarkers in predicting binary events. , 2014, Biostatistics.

[14]  Paul S Albert,et al.  A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Constantine Frangakis,et al.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? , 2011, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[16]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[17]  J. Grego Generalized Additive Models , 2006 .

[18]  Cristiana Larizza,et al.  A Unified Approach for Modeling Longitudinal and Failure Time Data, With Application in Medical Monitoring , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[20]  Gail,et al.  International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium Partners^ , 2016 .