Experimental Performance Analysis of a Constraint-Based Navigation Framework

This paper describes and experimentally demonstrates a new approach to shared-adaptive control of human-machine systems. Motivated by observed human proclivity toward fields of safe travel rather than specific trajectories, our approach is rooted in the planning and enforcement of constraints rather than the more traditional reference paths. This approach identifies path homotopies, bounds a desired homotopy with constraints, and allocates control as necessary to ensure that these constraints remain satisfied without unduly restricting the human operator. We present a summary of this framework’s technical background and analyze its effect both with and without driver feedback on the performance and confidence of 20 different drivers teleoperating an unmanned (teleoperated) vehicle through an outdoor obstacle course. In 1,200 trials, constraint-based semi-autonomy was shown to increase operator speed by 26% while reducing the occurrence of collisions by 78%, and improving overall user confidence and sense of control by 44% and 12%, respectively – all while assuming less than 43% control of the vehicle.

[1]  S S Stevens,et al.  HUMAN ENGINEERING FOR AN EFFECTIVE AIR-NAVIGATION AND TRAFFIC-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND APPENDIXES 1 THRU 3 , 1951 .

[2]  J C Fell,et al.  THE RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF UNSAFE DRIVING ACTS IN SERIOUS TRAFFIC CRASHES - SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT , 2001 .

[3]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Shared control between human and machine: haptic display of automation during manual control of vehicle heading , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[4]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Human-Automation Interaction , 2005 .

[5]  Sterling J. Anderson,et al.  An optimal-control-based framework for trajectory planning, threat assessment, and semi-autonomous control of passenger vehicles in hazard avoidance scenarios , 2010 .

[6]  J C Fell,et al.  THE RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF UNSAFE DRIVING ACTS IN SERIOUS TRAFFIC CRASHES - SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT , 2000 .

[7]  Luke Fletcher,et al.  A perception‐driven autonomous urban vehicle , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[8]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Adaptable navigational assistance for intelligent wheelchairs by means of an implicit personalized user model , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Ronald Brown.  Topology and Groupoids , 2006 .

[11]  J. Gibson,et al.  A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving , 1938 .

[12]  Reinhard Oppermann,et al.  Adaptive user support: ergonomic design of manually and automatically adaptable software , 1994 .

[13]  J R Treat,et al.  TRI-LEVEL STUDY OF THE CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS: FINAL REPORT , 1979 .

[14]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Effects of Visual Interface Design, and Control Mode and Latency on Performance, Telepresence and Workload in a Teleoperation Task , 2000 .

[15]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  How UGVs physically fail in the field , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Thomas Sattel,et al.  From robotics to automotive: Lane-keeping and collision avoidance based on elastic bands , 2008 .

[17]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Human-in-the-Loop: Terminal constraint receding horizon control with human inputs , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Jennifer N Dang,et al.  The Long-Term Effect of ABS in Passenger Cars and LTVs , 2009 .

[19]  T. Sattel,et al.  Combining haptic human-machine interaction with predictive path planning for lane-keeping and collision avoidance systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[20]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Formalizing Assistive Teleoperation , 2012, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[21]  Wolfgang Birk,et al.  A driver-distraction-based lane-keeping assistance system , 2007 .

[22]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Adaptive Automation, Level of Automation, Allocation Authority, Supervisory Control, and Adaptive Control: Distinctions and Modes of Adaptation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[23]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[24]  Corinna E. Lathan,et al.  The Effects of Operator Spatial Perception and Sensory Feedback on Human-Robot Teleoperation Performance , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.