Herbicide‐quinone competition in the acceptor complex of photosynthetic reaction centers from rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides: A bacterial model for PS‐II‐herbicide activity in plants

A select group of herbicides that inhibit photosystem II also act at the acceptor side of the reaction center (RC) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides, with much the same relative specificity as in plants. These include the triazines and some phenolic compounds. The proposal that herbicides inhibit the electron transfer from the primary quinone (QA) to the secondary quinone (QB) by competing for the secondary quinone binding site—the B‐site— [5], is tested here with terbutryn, the most potent of the triazines. Competition between terbutryn and ubiquinone (Q‐10) was observed using the kinetics of the back‐reaction as a measure of inhibition. The model includes binding equilibria before and after flash activation. The binding constants for the preflash (dark) equilibria, for reaction centers in 0.14% lauryl dimethylamine‐N‐oxide (LDAO), were K  iD = 0.8 μM terbutryn, K  qD = 2 μM Q‐10; both are detergent‐concentration dependent. After flash activation, binding equilibrium is not fully restored on the time scale of the back‐reaction because terbutryn unbinds slowly. This gives rise to biphasic decay kinetics from which koff for terbutryn was estimated to be 3 sec–1. Titrations of the rate of the slow back reaction indicated that the post‐flash equilibrium is less sensitive to inhibitor, in a manner that is independent of the much stronger binding of the semiquinone, Q  B– , and indicative of a direct effect of the redox state of QA on the affinity of the B‐site for ligands. However, the effects on K  iL and K  qD could not be separated: either K  iL > K  iD or K  qD < K  qD . Some triazine‐resistant mutants have been isolated and are described. All appear to be herbicide binding site mutants. Whole cells and photosynthetic membrane vesicles (chromatophores) exhibit a 10–50‐fold increase in resistance to triazines due, in large part, to an increase in the rate of unbinding (koff). The modifications of the binding site appear to diminish the affinity of the B‐site for ubiquinone as well as terbutryn. It is concluded that bacterial RCs are a useful model for the study of herbicide activity and specificity.

[1]  U. Johanningmeier,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR TWO DIFFERENT HERBICIDE BINDING PROTEINS AT THE REDUCING SIDE OF PHOTOSYSTEM II , 1982 .

[2]  G. Feher,et al.  Primary acceptor in bacterial photosynthesis: obligatory role of ubiquinone in photoactive reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Wim F. J. Vermaas Govindjee THE ACCEPTOR SIDE OF PHOTOSYSTEM II IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS * , 1981 .

[4]  C. Wraight Oxidation‐Reduction Physical Chemistry of the Acceptor Quinone Complex in Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers: Evidence for a New Model of Herbicide Activity , 1981 .

[5]  C. Wraight Iron—quinone interactions in the electron acceptor region of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers , 1978 .

[6]  K. A. Hibberd,et al.  Herbicide Resistance in Plants , 2020 .

[7]  A. Verméglio,et al.  Kinetics of electron transfer between the primary and the secondary electron acceptor in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  C. Wraight,et al.  THE ROLE OF QUINONES IN BACTERIAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1979 .

[9]  H. Strotmann,et al.  Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  N. Chua,et al.  Lithium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of thylakoid membranes at 4 degrees C: Characterizations of two additional chlorophyll a-protein complexes. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Y. Inoue The Oxygen evolving system of photosynthesis , 1983 .

[12]  P. Dutton,et al.  Ubiquinone in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Some thermodynamic properties. , 1979, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  R. R. Stein,et al.  BACTERIAL REACTION CENTERS AS A MODEL FOR PHOTOSYSTEM II: TURNOVER OF THE SECONDARY ACCEPTOR QUINONE , 1983 .

[14]  S. Provencher,et al.  An eigenfunction expansion method for the analysis of exponential decay curves , 1976 .

[15]  C. Wraight 2 – The Involvement of Stable Semiquinones in the Two-Electron Gates of Plant and Bacterial Photosystems , 1982 .

[16]  C. Wraight Electron acceptors of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. II. H+ binding coupled to secondary electron transfer in the quinone acceptor complex. , 1979, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  R. Prince,et al.  THE REACTION CENTER OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC BACTERIA , 1978 .

[18]  R. R. Stein,et al.  Redox equilibrium in the acceptor quinone complex of isolated reaction centers and the mode of action of O‐phenanthroline , 1980, FEBS letters.

[19]  G. Feher,et al.  Localization of the secondary quinone-binding site in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 by antibody inhibition of electron transfer , 1982 .

[20]  G. Feher,et al.  Localization of the primary quinone binding site in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 by photoaffinity labeling. , 1979, Biochemistry.

[21]  A. Crofts,et al.  The electrochemical domain of photosynthesis , 1983 .

[22]  M. Marietta,et al.  Electron‐dependent competition between plastoquinone and inhibitors for binding to photosystem II , 1981 .

[23]  M. Briquet,et al.  Properties of 3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea and other inhibitors of the cytochrome bc1 segment of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1978, European journal of biochemistry.