Proficiency Testing Trends Following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report, “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward”

ABSTRACT The 2009 NAS Report made several recommendations, among which was a call for increased accreditation of forensic laboratories and certification of forensic scientists. Proficiency testing, a key quality measure for both accreditation and certification, was also cited in the Report as being mandatory to achieve and maintain these quality indicators. Data from a proficiency test provider was analyzed from the period of 2008–2015 to examine if laboratories were increasing proficiency testing by examining enrollment numbers and the return rate of the completed proficiency tests. Noting a key difference in domestic and international laboratories, additional data from the period of 2004–2015 was analyzed to examine the return rate of proficiency tests against the percentage of reports released to accreditation bodies. The entirety of the data was reviewed to see if the 2009 NAS Report's recommendations were being enacted by looking for an increasing number of accredited laboratories enrolling in proficiency tests, returning the test results, and reporting the proficiency testing outcomes to accrediting bodies in the period following 2009–2010. Despite the recommendations put forward by the National Academies for increased accreditation, certification, and as a result, proficiency testing, the current data from proficiency test enrollment and return rate does not show a marked increase in proficiency testing in U.S.-based forensic laboratories, but does reflect an increase in the ratio of proficiency test results submitted to support accreditation for the laboratories.

[1]  A. M. Kidd,et al.  Possibilities and Need for Development of Legal Medicine in the United States , 1933 .

[2]  B. D. Gaudette,et al.  An attempt at determining probabilities in human scalp hair comparison. , 1974, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  B C Gaudette Probabilities and human pubic hair comparisons. , 1976, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  R. Ogle,et al.  Probabilities and human hair comparison. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Heinz C. Luegenbiehl,et al.  Codes of Ethics and the Moral Education of Engineers , 1983 .

[6]  John Ladd,et al.  The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion , 1985 .

[7]  Michael Davis,et al.  Thinking like an engineer: the place of a code of ethics , 2017 .

[8]  A. Pérez-Lezaun,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA error prophylaxis: assessing the causes of errors in the GEP'02-03 proficiency testing trial. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[9]  Tom Scholl,et al.  Bioinformatics and Human Identification in Mass Fatality Incidents: The World Trade Center Disaster * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert , 2007 .

[11]  J. Bohan,et al.  Review of: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2010 .

[12]  Max M. Houck National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) , 2013 .

[13]  Paul J. Speaker Financial Management of Forensic Science Laboratories: Lessons from Project FORESIGHT 2011-2012 , 2015 .

[14]  Stephan Freytag Ethical Issues In Engineering , 2016 .