Computational Aeroheating Predictions for Mars Lander Configurations

The proposed Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission is intended to deliver a large rover to the Martian surface within 10 km of the target site. This paper presents computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions of forebody heating rates for two MSL entry configurations with fixed aerodynamic trim tabs. Results are compared to heating on a 70-deg sphere-cone reference geometry. All three heatshield geometries are designed to trim hypersonically at a 16 deg angle of attack in order to generate the lift-to-drag ratio (LID) required for precision landing. Comparisons between CFD and tunnel data are generally in good agreement for each configuration, but the computations predict more flow separation and higher heating on a trim tab inclined 10 deg relative to the surface. CFD solutions at flight conditions were obtained using an 8-species Mars gas in chemical and thermal non-equilibrium. Laminar and Baldwin-Lomax solutions were used to estimate the effects of the trim tabs and turbulence on heating. A tab extending smoothly from the heatshield flank is not predicted to increase laminar or turbulent heating rates above the reference levels. Laminar heating on a tab deflected 10 deg from the conical heatshield is influenced by flow separation and is up to 35% above the baseline heating rate. The turbulent solution on the inclined tab configuration predicts attached flow and a 43% heating increase above the reference level.

[1]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Mars Polar Lander Aerothermodynamic and Entry Dispersion Analysis , 1999 .

[2]  Cheatwood F. McNeil,et al.  User''s Manual for the Langley Aerothermodynamic Upwind Relaxation Algorithm (LAURA) , 1996 .

[3]  J Alter Stephen The Volume Grid Manipulator (VGM): A Grid Reusability Tool , 1997 .

[4]  F. R. Riddell,et al.  Theory of Stagnation Point Heat Transfer in Dissociated Air , 1958 .

[5]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[6]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Control Surface and Afterbody Experimental Aeroheating for a Proposed Mars Smart Lander Aeroshell , 2002 .

[7]  Brian R. Hollis,et al.  Boundary Layer Transition Correlations and Aeroheating Predictions for Mars Smart Lander , 2002 .

[8]  Mike J. Baines Introduction to “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes” , 1997 .

[9]  J. Balaram,et al.  Mars Smart Lander Simulations for Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2002 .

[10]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  X-38 Experimental Aerothermodynamics , 2000 .

[11]  Ramadas K. Prabhu,et al.  Aerodynamic Database Development for Mars Smart Lander Vehicle Configurations , 2002 .

[12]  Dinesh K. Prabhu,et al.  CFD code comparisons for Mars entry simulations , 1998 .

[13]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  Review of Chemical-Kinetic Problems of Future NASA Missions, II: Mars Entries , 1993 .

[14]  R. A. Thompson,et al.  The addition of algebraic turbulence modeling to program LAURA , 1993 .

[15]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Entry System Design Considerations for Mars Landers , 2001 .

[16]  Brian R. Hollis,et al.  Heat Shield Cavity Parametric Experimental Aeroheating for a Proposed Mars Smart Lander Aeroshell , 2002 .

[17]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .

[18]  John R. Chawner,et al.  Gridgen's Implementation of Partial Differential Equation Based Structured Grid Generation Methods , 1999, IMR.

[19]  G. L. Brauer,et al.  Capabilities and applications of the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST). Program summary document , 1977 .

[20]  Reese L. Sorenson,et al.  A 3DGRAPE/AL: The Ames/Langley technology upgrade , 1995 .