Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges?

A fundamental assumption in invasion biology is that most invasive species exhibit enhanced performance in their introduced range relative to their home ranges. This idea has given rise to numerous hypotheses explaining "invasion success" by virtue of altered ecological and evolutionary pressures. There are surprisingly few data, however, testing the underlying assumption that the performance of introduced populations, including organism size, reproductive output, and abundance, is enhanced in their introduced compared to their native range. Here, we combined data from published studies to test this hypothesis for 26 plant and 27 animal species that are considered to be invasive. On average, individuals of these 53 species were indeed larger, more fecund, and more abundant in their introduced ranges. The overall mean, however, belied significant variability among species, as roughly half of the investigated species (N=27) performed similarly when compared to conspecific populations in their native range. Thus, although some invasive species are performing better in their new ranges, the pattern is not universal, and just as many are performing largely the same across ranges.

[1]  C. Lortie,et al.  Biogeographical contrasts to assess local and regional patterns of invasion: a case study with two reciprocally introduced exotic maple trees , 2012 .

[2]  S. Hartley,et al.  The widespread collapse of an invasive species: Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand , 2012, Biology Letters.

[3]  R. Hufbauer,et al.  Exploring the potential for climatic factors, herbivory, and co-occurring vegetation to shape performance in native and introduced populations of Verbascum thapsus , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[4]  M. Schwarzländer,et al.  Biogeographical comparison of the invasive Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[5]  J. Pergl,et al.  Alien Plants Introduced by Different Pathways Differ in Invasion Success: Unintentional Introductions as a Threat to Natural Areas , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Anne Kempel,et al.  Introduction bias: Cultivated alien plant species germinate faster and more abundantly than native species in Switzerland , 2011 .

[8]  Inderjit,et al.  Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[9]  A. Estoup,et al.  Inbreeding Depression Is Purged in the Invasive Insect Harmonia axyridis , 2011, Current Biology.

[10]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[11]  R. Carruthers,et al.  Introduced populations of Genista monspessulana (French broom) are more dense and produce a greater seed rain in California, USA, than native populations in the Mediterranean Basin of Europe , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[12]  Emily E. Puckett,et al.  Controls on pathogen species richness in plants’ introduced and native ranges: roles of residence time, range size and host traits , 2010, Ecology letters.

[13]  M. Fischer,et al.  Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[14]  J. Parker,et al.  Novel Weapons Testing: Are Invasive Plants More Chemically Defended than Native Plants? , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[16]  J. E. Byers,et al.  Differential escape from parasites by two competing introduced crabs , 2009 .

[17]  R. Callaway,et al.  A cross-continental test of the Enemy Release Hypothesis: leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[18]  C. Hawkes.  Are Invaders Moving Targets? The Generality and Persistence of Advantages in Size, Reproduction, and Enemy Release in Invasive Plant Species with Time since Introduction , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Anna Liu,et al.  Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  A. Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[21]  J. Parker,et al.  Opposing Effects of Native and Exotic Herbivores on Plant Invasions , 2006, Science.

[22]  D. Strayer,et al.  Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  O. Bossdorf,et al.  Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations , 2005, Oecologia.

[24]  J. Maron,et al.  A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range , 2005 .

[25]  U. Schaffner,et al.  Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? , 2005 .

[26]  H. Hinz,et al.  Comparing Invasive Plants from Their Native and Exotic Range: What Can We Learn for Biological Control?1 , 2004 .

[27]  R. Callaway,et al.  Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability , 2004 .

[28]  P. Edwards,et al.  Introduced plants of the invasive Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than conspecifics in the native range , 2004 .

[29]  E. Grosholz,et al.  Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates , 2003 .

[30]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens , 2003, Nature.

[31]  A. Dobson,et al.  Introduced species and their missing parasites , 2003, Nature.

[32]  R. P. Randall,et al.  A Global Compendium of Weeds , 2002 .

[33]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Invasion success: does size really matter? , 2002 .

[34]  A. Sheppard,et al.  The comparative demography of the pasture weed Echium plantagineum between its native and invaded ranges , 2001 .

[35]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Are Plants Really Larger in Their Introduced Ranges? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[36]  K. Schierenbeck,et al.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants , 2000 .

[37]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[38]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[39]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[41]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[42]  B. Blossey,et al.  Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis , 1995 .

[43]  W. J. Freeland.  Large herbivorous mammals: exotic species in northern Australia. , 1990 .

[44]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[45]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[46]  A. Donald,et al.  Supplemental Material to , 2013 .

[47]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[48]  R. Hufbauer,et al.  Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Theory of Biological Invasions , 2008 .

[49]  H. Hinz,et al.  Weed Science Society of America Comparing Invasive Plants from Their Native and Exotic Range : What Can We Learn for Biological Control ? , 2008 .

[50]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants , 2005 .

[51]  R. N. Mack.  Cultivation Fosters Plant Naturalization by Reducing Environmental Stochasticity , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[52]  S. Lowe,et al.  100 of the world's worst invasive alien species. A selection from the global invasive species database , 2004 .

[53]  M. Vilà,et al.  Evidence for the enemy release hypothesis in Hypericum perforatum , 2004, Oecologia.

[54]  K. Lafferty,et al.  Release from Parasites as Natural Enemies: Increased Performance of a Globally Introduced Marine Crab , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[55]  K R Abrams,et al.  Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[56]  Issg.  100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection From The Global Invasive Species Database , 2000 .

[57]  A. Bradshaw.  Some of the Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Plant , 1972 .