Implementation of iterative metal artifact reduction in the pre-planning-procedure of three-dimensional physical modeling

BackgroundTo assess the impact of metal artifact reduction techniques in 3D printing by evaluating image quality and segmentation time in both phantom and patient studies with dental restorations and/or other metal implants. An acrylic denture apparatus (Kilgore Typodent, Kilgore International, Coldwater, MI) was set in a 20 cm water phantom and scanned on a single-source CT scanner with gantry tilting capacity (SOMATOM Edge, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) under 5 scenerios: (1) Baseline acquisition at 120 kV with no gantry tilt, no jaw spacer, (2) acquisition at 140 kV, (3) acquisition with a gantry tilt at 15°, (4) acquisition with a non-radiopaque jaw spacer and (5) acquisition with a jaw spacer and a gantry tilt at 15°. All acquisitions were reconstructed both with and without a dedicated iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (MAR). Patients referred for a head-and-neck exam were included into the study. Acquisitions were performed on the same scanner with 120 kV and the images were reconstructed with and without iterative MAR. Segmentation was performed on a dedicated workstation (Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control Systems; Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) to quantify volume of metal artifact and segmentation time.ResultsIn the phantom study, the use of gantry tilt, jaw spacer and increased tube voltage showed no benefit in time or artifact volume reduction. However the jaw spacer allowed easier separation of the upper and lower jaw and a better display of the teeth. The use of dedicated iterative MAR significantly reduced the metal artifact volume and processing time. Same observations were made for the four patients included into the study.ConclusionThe use of dedicated iterative MAR and jaw spacer substantially reduced metal artifacts in the head-and-neck CT acquisitions, hence allowing a faster 3D segmentation workflow.

[1]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy , 2016, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  Anthony P. Trace,et al.  Radiology's Emerging Role in 3-D Printing Applications in Health Care. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  Marc E. Nelson,et al.  Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al.  Iterative metal artifact reduction: Evaluation and optimization of technique , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  Justin W. Adams 3D Printing in Anatomical and Palaeontological Teaching and Research , 2016 .

[7]  R Bibb,et al.  The custom-made titanium orbital floor prosthesis in reconstruction for orbital floor fractures. , 2003, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  Yong-Min Huh,et al.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Scott J. Hollister,et al.  Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT Metal Artifact Reduction in the Spine: Can an Iterative Reconstruction Technique Improve Visualization? , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  J. Ross,et al.  The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine. , 2014, JAMA.

[12]  Diagnostic accuracy of state-of-the-art MDCT scanners without gantry tilt in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[13]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  Val M Runge,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Impact of iterative metal artifact reduction on diagnostic image quality in patients with dental hardware , 2017, Acta radiologica.

[16]  E. Meyer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the normalized metal artefact reduction algorithm caused by dental fillings in CT. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  Alessandro Marro,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing and Medical Imaging: A Review of the Methods and Applications. , 2016, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[18]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation , 2011, European Radiology.

[19]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Three-dimensional Physical Modeling: Applications and Experience at Mayo Clinic. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Using Energetic Extrapolation: A Systematically Optimized Protocol , 2012, Investigative radiology.