Shape recognition alters sensitivity in stereoscopic depth discrimination.

A fundamental question in visual perception is to characterize how information from sensory input is integrated with prior probabilities. The role of prior probabilities is controversial for elementary visual processes, which are often believed to be immune from higher-level influences. In this paper, we demonstrate such influences. We tested human observers' abilities to discriminate stereoscopic depth defined by points embedded in a biological pattern--a human figure. Our results indicate that the internal representation of a walking human figure imposed constraints on depth discrimination of a static stimulus. This constraint was manifested when the stimulus was recognized as a human figure. When the expected human figure configuration (forearms having equal length) was inconsistent with the sensory input information, discrimination of forearm lengths was impaired. In contrast, when there was no inconsistency (the hand-hip distance on the left was not expected to be equal to that on the right), discrimination between the two distances was improved, presumably because the human figure configuration provided a more accurate frame of reference for stereoscopic depth. Both the impairment and improvement were due to changes of discrimination sensitivity rather than decision bias. Our findings support the view that visual perception is an inference process constrained by Bayesian prior probabilities.

[1]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects , 1998, Cognition.

[2]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Alexander Grunewald,et al.  Neural Correlates of Structure-from-Motion Perception in Macaque V1 and MT , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .

[5]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Depth attraction and repulsion of disparate foveal stimuli , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Bayesian models of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Gregory Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1966 .

[13]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  Bennett L. Schwartz,et al.  Interaction between Transparency and Structure from Motion , 1992, Neural Computation.

[15]  S. McKee,et al.  Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference plane , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Basri,et al.  The role of convexity in perceptual completion: beyond good continuation , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Interaction of visual prior constraints , 2001, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[20]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[21]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching? , 2005, Journal of vision.

[22]  D. L. Adams,et al.  Functional organization of macaque V3 for stereoscopic depth. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  K Nakayama,et al.  Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. , 1992, Science.

[24]  M. Morgan,et al.  The aperture problem in stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[26]  D. Glaser,et al.  Depth discrimination of a line is improved by adding other nearby lines , 1992, Vision Research.

[27]  D. Levi,et al.  Amodal Completion and Vernier Acuity: Evidence of ‘Top-But-Not-Very-Far-Down’ Processes? , 1995, Perception.

[28]  S. McKee,et al.  Contour completion through depth interferes with stereoacuity , 2002, Vision Research.

[29]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth , 1998, Nature.

[30]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[31]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Illusory motion from shadows , 1996, Nature.

[32]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. , 1983 .

[33]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Perceptual “Read-Out” of Conjoined Direction and Disparity Maps in Extrastriate Area MT , 2004, PLoS biology.

[34]  G H Fisher "Mother, father, and daughter": a three-aspect ambiguous figure. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[35]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Organization of Disparity-Selective Neurons in Macaque Area MT , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Pelli,et al.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[37]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The perception of depth in simple figures , 1984, Vision Research.

[38]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[39]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Local and global factors in disparity detection of rows of points , 1988, Vision Research.

[40]  D. Badcock,et al.  Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  The efficiency of depth discrimination for non-transparent and transparent stereoscopic surfaces , 2004, Vision Research.

[42]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[43]  Bart Farell,et al.  Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in human stereopsis , 1998, Nature.

[44]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[45]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  Amodal completion impairs stereoacuity discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[46]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  General Pattern Theory: A Mathematical Study of Regular Structures , 1993 .

[47]  William Epstein,et al.  Varieties of perceptual learning , 1967 .

[48]  J. Feldman Bias toward regular form in mental shape spaces. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  K. N. Ogle Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[50]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings , 1998, Vision Research.

[51]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some Experiments on the Perception of Synthetic Speech Sounds , 1952 .

[52]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[53]  James J. Clark,et al.  Data Fusion for Sensory Information Processing Systems , 1990 .

[54]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[55]  C. Blakemore The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  Philip J Kellman,et al.  Surface integration influences depth discrimination , 2000, Vision Research.