Neo-piagetian theory as a guide to curriculum analysis

The development of a coherent curriculum, encapsulating appropriate topics, learning materials and assessment, is crucial for a successful educational experience. However, designing such a curriculum is a complicated task, with challenges in tracing the development of concepts across multiple courses and ensuring that assessment is at an appropriate level at specific points in the curricula. In this paper, we introduce a curriculum mapping framework based on Neo-Piagetian theory that assists lecturers in tracing concept development and assessment throughout their courses. This framework supports the identification of prerequisite concepts, where students are already assumed to be aware of specific topics, and assessment leaps, where students are assessed at a different conceptual level than they have been taught. We illustrate the application of our framework through a case study analysing the syllabus of a sequence of three first year programming courses.

[1]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[2]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Towards a syllabus repository for computer science courses , 2007, SIGCSE.

[3]  Nickolas J. G. Falkner,et al.  Neo-piagetian Forms of Reasoning in Software Development Process Construction , 2013, 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering.

[4]  Martha Stone Wiske,et al.  New technologies to support teaching for understanding , 2001 .

[5]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Designing Effective Instruction , 1997 .

[6]  Raymond Lister,et al.  Concrete and other neo-Piagetian forms of reasoning in the novice programmer , 2011, ACE 2011.

[7]  Karen P. Walker,et al.  Obstacles to Learning a Second Programming Language: An Empirical Study , 1996, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[8]  Sergio Morra,et al.  Cognitive Development : Neo-Piagetian Perspectives , 2012 .

[9]  J. Elshout,et al.  The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. , 1997 .

[10]  Judy Kay,et al.  On the reliability of classifying programming tasks using a neo-piagetian theory of cognitive development , 2012, ICER '12.

[11]  Eugene G. Kowch,et al.  Designing effective instruction , 2004 .

[12]  Ron Zucker,et al.  ViCurriAS: a curriculum visualization tool for faculty, advisors, and students , 2009 .

[13]  K. H. Stauder,et al.  Psychology of the Child , 1959 .

[14]  John G. Meinke,et al.  Topological sorting as a tool in curriculum planning , 1976, SIGCSE '76.

[15]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[16]  Walter Dick,et al.  Instructional Planning: A Guide for Teachers , 1995 .

[17]  Rosemary E. Sutton,et al.  Neo-Piagetian Theory and Research: Enhancing Pedagogical Practice for Educators of Adults. , 2004 .

[18]  Sigrun Sveinbjornsdottir,et al.  S. Morra, C. Gobbo, Z. Marini, R. Sheese (eds.), Cognitive Psychology: Neo-Piagetian Perspectives (New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008). , 2010 .

[19]  Kazunori Yamaguchi,et al.  Analysis of computer science related curriculum on LDA and Isomap , 2010, ITiCSE '10.

[20]  Hideki Mima,et al.  MIMA Search: A Structuring Knowledge System towards Innovation for Engineering Education , 2006, ACL.