Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme.

Abstract Agri-environment schemes have been developed by the member states of the European Union over the last 10 years. Under Regulation 2078/92, the UK has supported English Nature in the implementation of a nature conservation scheme for wet grazing land in southern England. This paper explores the different understandings of nature held by farmers and conservationists who are participating in the Wildlife Enhancement Scheme, by drawing on qualitative research completed between 1993 and 1995. Through the application of actor network theory, the analysis compares the role and identity ascribed to farmers by conservationists with the identity that farmers’ construct of themselves. The former construct farmers as technicians, ignorant of the workings of nature, whereas the farmers see themselves as ‘natural conservationists’. The paper explores how nature is translated differently in the worlds of conservation science and agriculture. In the final part of the paper, discussion focuses on the management of the wetland ditches where these sets of translations come together. It reveals that the rigid, scientific prescriptions for management of the conservation value of the ditches are considerably at odds with the more flexible and sensitive practices of farmers themselves.

[1]  G. Myers.  Out of the Laboratory and Down to the Bay , 1996 .

[2]  I. Hodge,et al.  Evaluating the environmentally sensitive areas: the value of rural environments and policy relevance , 1998 .

[3]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[4]  M. Edelstein.  Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[5]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Respondents' evaluations of a CV survey: a case study based on an economic valuation of the Wildlife Enhancement Scheme, Pevensey Levels in East Sussex , 1998 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[7]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Social Constructions of Nature: A Case Study of Conflicts over the Development of Rainham Marshes , 1994 .

[8]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Exploring Environmental Values through the Medium of Small Groups: 2. Illustrations of a Group at Work , 1988 .

[9]  M. Felton.  Achieving nature conservation objectives: problems and opportunities with economics , 1993 .

[10]  C. Newbold,et al.  Nature conservation and the management of drainage channels , 1989 .

[11]  K. Mellanby.  Farming and wildlife , 1981 .

[12]  M. Winter.  Rural Politics: Policies for Agriculture, Forestry and the Environment , 1996 .

[13]  Contested meanings: the consumption of news about nature conservation , 1991 .

[14]  C. Potter,et al.  Conceptualising the Evolution of the European Union's Agri-Environment Policy: A Discourse Approach , 1997 .

[15]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations , 1997 .

[16]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Environmental Sociology: Theory and Practice@@@Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective@@@Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology , 1997 .

[17]  Sarah Webster,et al.  Targeting for nature conservation in agricultural policy , 1993 .

[18]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[19]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studies , 1997 .

[20]  J. Burgess,et al.  "I struggled with this money business”: Respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation , 2000 .

[21]  V. T. Parker,et al.  The New Paradigm in Ecology: Implications for Conservation Biology Above the Species Level , 1992 .

[22]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[23]  Joan Iverson Nassauer,et al.  The Aesthetics of Horticulture: Neatness as a Form of Care , 1988, HortScience.

[24]  Michael Winter.  Landwise or land foolish? Free conservation advice for farmers in the wider english countryside , 1996 .

[25]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[26]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications , 1991 .

[27]  J Clark,et al.  Discounted knowledges: farmers» and residents» understandings of nature conservation goals and policies , 1998 .

[28]  Carolyn Harrison,et al.  Respondents' evaluations of a contingent valuation survey: a case study based on an economic valuation of the wildlife enhancement scheme, Pevensey Levels in East Sussex , 1998 .

[29]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[30]  G. Wilson.  Assessing the environmental impact of the environmentally sensitive areas scheme: a case for using farmers’ environmental knowledge? , 1997 .

[31]  Social constructions of nature: A case study of the conflicts over Rainham Marshes SSSI , 1994 .

[32]  C. McEachern.  Farmers and conservation: Conflict and accommodation in farming politics , 1992 .

[33]  Philip Lowe,et al.  Cleaning up agriculture: environment, technology and social science , 1992 .

[34]  Andrew Warren,et al.  Conservation in progress. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Gasson.  GOALS AND VALUES OF FARMERS , 1973 .

[36]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Exploring Environmental Values through the Medium of Small Groups: 1. Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[37]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[38]  H. E. Dresser.  Society for the Protection of Birds , 1896 .