A hybrid genetic based optimization procedure for aircraft conceptual analysis

The problem to define a methodology for the analysis of aircraft performances, in the phase of conceptual design, is addressed. The proposed approach is based on a numerical optimization procedure where a scalar objective function, the take-off weight, is minimized. Deterministic and stochastic approaches as well as hybridizations between these two search techniques are considered. More precisely, we consider two-stage strategies where the optimum localization is performed by a genetic algorithm, while a gradient-based method is used to terminate the optimization process. Also, another type of hybridization strategy is investigated where a partially converged gradient-based method is incorporated in the genetic algorithm as a new operator. A detailed discussion is made and various different solutions are critically compared.The proposed methodology is consistent and capable of giving fundamental information to the designer for further investigating towards the directions identified by the procedure.A basic example is described, and the use of the methodology to establish the effects of different geometrical and technological parameters is discussed.

[1]  C. Poloni,et al.  Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for a complex design problem in fluid dynamics , 2000 .

[2]  Gabriel Winter,et al.  TOWARDS A STOP CRITERION FOR SIMPLE GENETIC ALGORITHM, SGA , 2000 .

[3]  D. Quagliarella,et al.  Airfoil and wing design through hybrid optimization strategies , 1998 .

[4]  A. Długosz,et al.  COUPLING OF THE BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD AND EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS IN OPTIMIZATION AND IDENTIFICATION PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[5]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A role for genetic algorithms in a preliminary design environment , 1993 .

[6]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  AIRCRAFT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 2000 .

[7]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Development and application of a comprehensive, design-sensitive weight prediction method for wing structures of transport category aircraft , 1992 .

[8]  Daniel Raymer,et al.  A Comparative Study of Genetic Algorithm and Orthogonal Steepest Descent for Aircraft Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2002 .

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  K. Krishnakumar,et al.  Applications of evolutionary algorithms to aerospace problems : A survey , 1996 .

[11]  Helena Szczerbicka,et al.  Efficient Parameter Optimization Based on Combination of Direct Global and Local Search Methods , 1999 .

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Conceptual design of helicopters via genetic algorithm , 1996 .

[14]  L. Morino,et al.  Subsonic Potential Aerodynamics for Complex Configurations: A General Theory , 1974 .

[15]  Giovanni Lombardi,et al.  Induced drag prediction for wing-tail and canard configurations through numerical optimisation , 1994, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[16]  P. Hajela Nongradient Methods in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization-Status and Potential , 1999 .

[17]  Giovanni Mengali,et al.  A methodology for the preliminary analysis and comparison of wing-tail and canard configurations , 1997, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[18]  Jongsoo Lee,et al.  Parallel Genetic Algorithm Implementation in Multidisciplinary Rotor Blade Design , 1996 .

[19]  Luciano Blasi,et al.  Conceptual Aircraft Design Based on a Multiconstraint Genetic Optimizer , 2000 .