Audio aided electro-tactile perception training for finger posture biofeedback

Visual information is one of the prerequisites for most biofeedback studies. The aim of this study is to explore how the usage of an audio aided training helps in the learning process of dynamical electro-tactile perception without any visual feedback. In this research, the electrical simulation patterns associated with the experimenter's finger postures and motions were presented to the subjects. Along with the electrical stimulation patterns 2 different types of information, verbal and audio information on finger postures and motions, were presented to the verbal training subject group (group 1) and audio training subject group (group 2), respectively. The results showed an improvement in the ability to distinguish and memorize electrical stimulation patterns correspondent to finger postures and motions without visual feedback, and with audio tones aid, the learning was faster and the perception became more precise after training. Thus, this study clarified that, as a substitution to visual presentation, auditory information could help effectively in the formation of electro-tactile perception. Further research effort needed to make clear the difference between the visual guided and audio aided training in terms of information compilation, post-training effect and robustness of the perception.

[1]  R.R. Riso,et al.  Cognitive feedback for use with FES upper extremity neuroprostheses , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Z. Telatar,et al.  Effectiveness of a new joint position biofeedback training system development and its application on hemiplegic patients , 1992, Proceedings of the 1992 International Biomedical Engineering Days.

[3]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  An auditory display system for aiding interjoint coordination , 2000 .

[5]  T. Arai,et al.  FES as Biofeedback for an EMG Controlled Prosthetic Hand , 2005, TENCON 2005 - 2005 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[6]  F.B. Horak,et al.  A portable audio-biofeedback system to improve postural control , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Gerald F. Harris,et al.  A biofeedback cane system: instrumentation and subject application results , 1995 .

[8]  Gerald F. Harris,et al.  A bioleedback cane system: instrumentation and subject application results , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[9]  K. Kaczmarek,et al.  Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: preliminary results. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Alejandro Hernández Arieta,et al.  An fMRI Study on the Effects of Electrical Stimulation as Biofeedback , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Preliminary Results of a Recognition Training for Dynamical Electrical Pattern Feedback , 2007 .

[12]  Jiping He,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Biofeedback for Task-Oriented Neural Rehabilitation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[13]  Wolfgang Staffen,et al.  Stimulating music increases motor coordination in patients afflicted with Morbus Parkinson , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Task-Orientated Biofeedback System for the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[15]  Jiping He,et al.  Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[17]  K. Horch,et al.  Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[18]  J. L. Pons,et al.  A comparison of the Oxford and Manus intelligent hand prostheses , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).