Representational specificity of within-category phonetic variation in the long-term mental lexicon.

This study examines the potential encoding in long-term memory of subphonemic, within-category variation in voice onset time (VOT) and the degree to which this encoding of subtle variation is mediated by lexical competition. In 4 long-term repetition-priming experiments, magnitude of priming was examined as a function of variation in VOT in words with voiced counterparts (cape-gape) and without (cow-*gow) and words whose counterparts were high frequency (pest-best) or low frequency (pile-bile). The results showed that within-category variation was indeed encoded in memory and could have demonstrable effects on priming. However, there were also robust effects of prototypical representations on priming. Encoding of within-category variation was also affected by the presence of lexical counterparts and by the frequency of counterparts.

[1]  P. Luce,et al.  Falling on Sensitive Ears , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English , 1997 .

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[7]  F. Craik,et al.  The Effect of Speaker's Voice on Word Recognition , 1974 .

[8]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Change Some Thoughts on , 1988 .

[10]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[11]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[12]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  L A Streeter,et al.  The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[16]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[17]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Do Children and the Elderly Show Heightened Semantic Priming? How to Answer the Question. , 1994 .

[18]  J. L. Miller Properties of feature detectors for VOT: the voiceless channel of analysis. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[20]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[21]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Joanne L. Miller Internal Structure of Phonetic Categories , 1997 .

[24]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Speech Perception , 2004, Annual Review of Psychology.

[25]  J. Morton,et al.  Facilitation of auditory word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[26]  David DeSteno,et al.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  P. Luce,et al.  Specificity of memory representations for spoken words , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[30]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  M S Sommers Perceptual specificity and implicit auditory priming in older and younger adults. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[34]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[37]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .

[38]  D. Whalen Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Kenneth N Stevens,et al.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Interactive processes in speech perception: the TRACE model , 1986 .

[43]  S. M. Sheffert,et al.  Voice-specificity effects on auditory word priming , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Q. Summerfield Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of talker variability on speech perception: implications for current research and theory , 1990, ICSLP.

[46]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.

[47]  N. Lass Contemporary Issues in Experimental Phonetics , 1976 .

[48]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  M. Sommers Perceptual specificity and implicit auditory priming in older and younger adults. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[51]  Michael Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  chapter 8 – Speech Perception , 1976 .

[52]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[53]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[54]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate , 2001 .

[55]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[57]  J L Miller,et al.  Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Ridker Pm,et al.  C-reactive protein and risks of future myocardial infarction and thrombotic stroke. , 1998 .

[59]  D. Gallo,et al.  Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Language perception and production , 1987 .

[62]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[63]  H. Nusbaum Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[64]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[65]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[66]  A G Samuel,et al.  Phonetic prototypes , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[69]  M. Studdert-Kennedy The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. , 1987 .

[70]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  A. Reeves,et al.  Speaking Rate and Segments: A Look at the Relation between Speech Production and Speech Perception for the Voicing Contrast , 1986 .

[72]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[73]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[74]  B. Repp Dichotic Competition of Speech Sounds: The Role of Acoustic Stimulus Structure. , 1977 .