Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election

Electoral research acknowledges the growing significance of the mass media in contemporary campaigns, but scholars are divided on the nature of this influence. Using a unique database that includes both media content and public opinion, we examine the flow of partisan information from newspapers to the voters and assess the press's role in electoral politics and citizen learning. We find that the American press does not present clear and singular messages about presidential elections but, rather, multiple messages about the candidates and the campaign. In addition, perception of the information is shaped as much by an individual's political views as by the objective content. Despite the mixed messages, we find that a newspaper's editorial content is significantly related to candidate preferences in 1992. These results challenge the minimal effects interpretation of the media, because local newspapers can play a significant role in providing cues that influence voters' electoral calculus.

[1]  A. Campbell.  Elections and the Political Order , 1968 .

[2]  Larry M. Bartels.  Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[3]  B. Bagdikian.  The media monopoly , 1984 .

[4]  Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck,et al.  MASS MEDIA, THE ELECTORATE, AND THE BANDWAGON. A STUDY OF COMMUNICATION EFFECTS ON VOTE CHOICE IN GERMANY , 1996 .

[5]  D. Graber,et al.  Mass media and American politics , 1980 .

[6]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News , 1986 .

[7]  R. Niemi,et al.  Vital Statistics on American Politics , 1988 .

[8]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Going negative : how attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate , 1995 .

[9]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign , 1996 .

[10]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[11]  E. Noelle-Neumann.  The spiral of silence , 1984 .

[12]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. , 1985 .

[13]  The Media in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Campaigns , 1991 .

[14]  W. Bennett.  News, the politics of illusion , 1983 .

[15]  Thomas E. Patterson,et al.  The mass media election , 1980 .

[16]  S. Iyengar.  Is Anyone Responsible , 1991 .

[17]  T. E. Patterson.  Out Of Order , 1993 .

[18]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[19]  Joseph T. Klapper,et al.  The effects of mass communication , 1960 .

[20]  Susan Hoffman,et al.  The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: Revisiting the Asch situation. , 1976 .

[21]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  The Influence of Newspaper Endorsements in Presidential Elections: The Case of 1964 , 1976 .

[22]  Press, Party, and Presidency , 1982 .

[23]  P. Beck,et al.  VOTERS' INTERMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTS IN THE 1988 PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST , 1991 .

[24]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion , 1995 .

[25]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[26]  D. Weaver.  Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects , 1980 .

[27]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  INFORMATION FLOW AND THE STABILITY OF PARTISAN ATTITUDES , 1962 .

[28]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[29]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Constructing the political spectacle , 1989 .

[30]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The people's choice. , 1945 .

[31]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Political persuasion and attitude change , 1996 .