Assessment of scatter components in high-resolution PET: correction by nonstationary convolution subtraction.

UNLABELLED This paper describes a new approach to determine individual scatter kernels and to use them for scatter correction by integral transformation of the projections. METHODS Individual scatter components are fitted on the projections of a line source by monoexponentials. The position-dependent scatter parameters of each scatter components are then used to design non-stationary scatter correction kernels for each point in the projection. These kernels are used in a convolution-subtraction method which consecutively removes object, collimator and detector scatter from projections. This method is based on a model which assumes that image degradation results exclusively from Compton interactions of annihilation photons, thus neglecting further Compton interactions of object scatters with collimator and detector. RESULTS Subtraction of the object scatter component improved contrast typical of what is obtained with standard convolution-subtraction methods. The collimator scatter component is so weak that it can be safely combined with object scatter for correction. Subtraction of detector scatter from images did not improve contrast because statistical accuracy is degraded by removing counts from hot regions while cold regions (background) remain unchanged. CONCLUSION Subtraction of object and collimator scatter improves contrast only. The slight gain in image sharpness resulting from the subtraction of detector scatter does not justify removal of this component at the expense of sensitivity.

[1]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  High resolution positron emission tomography with a prototype camera based on solid state scintillation detectors , 1990 .

[2]  J. G. Rogers,et al.  Object shape dependent scatter simulations for PET , 1991 .

[3]  W. W. Moses,et al.  A positron tomograph with 600 BGO crystals and 2.6 mm resolution , 1988 .

[4]  R. Lecomte,et al.  A Bismuth Germanate-Avalanche Photodiode Module Designed for Use in High Resolution Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Sibylle Ziegler,et al.  Scatter correction in the transaxial slices of a whole-body positron emission tomograph , 1993 .

[6]  S. Larsson,et al.  Generalized scatter correction method in SPECT using point scatter distribution functions. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[8]  R Lecomte,et al.  Study of the resolution performance of an array of discrete detectors with independent readouts for positron emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  C. Bohm,et al.  Correction for Scattered Radiation in a Ring Detector Positron Camera by Integral Transformation of the Projections , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  C J Thompson,et al.  PETSIM: Monte Carlo simulation of all sensitivity and resolution parameters of cylindrical positron imaging systems. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  R. H. Huesman,et al.  Initial Results from the Donner 600 Crystal Positron Tomograph , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  C. Thompson,et al.  Measurement of the coincidence response of very thin BGO crystals , 1994 .

[13]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  The effect of collimation on scatter fraction in multi-slice PET , 1988 .