Adolescent bystanders' perspectives of aggression in the online versus school environments.

Researchers' understanding of bystanders' perspectives in the cyber-environment fails to take young people's perceptions into account and remains imperfect. Interventions encouraging adolescents to help targets of cyber-aggression are therefore typically based upon traditional school-based aggression research. Twenty-four in-depth interviews with Australian 13-16 year-olds revealed two themes that reflect how young bystanders perceive differences between aggression online and at school. The physical presence theme suggests that young bystanders struggle to determine online intentions in the absence of body language, leading to hesitancy in reactions and furthermore make it easier for them to ignore online transgressions and avoid becoming involved. The authority theme indicates young bystanders perceive that, compared to the school environment, the online environment lacks clearly established rules, authority figures and formal reporting mechanisms. These differences indicate that unique strategies should be developed to encourage young bystanders to intervene in cyber-aggression situations.

[1]  N. Schoenberg,et al.  Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research , 2000 .

[2]  Julian Dooley,et al.  Bullying in schools and in cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010 .

[3]  C. Peterson,et al.  Looking forward through the life span : developmental psychology , 2004 .

[4]  Robert Thornberg,et al.  Bystanders to bullying: fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions , 2014 .

[5]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites , 2011 .

[6]  M. Bloor,et al.  Putting it in context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing , 2010 .

[7]  D. Cross,et al.  Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying A Theoretical and Conceptual Review , 2009 .

[8]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[9]  David J. Harper,et al.  Choosing a Qualitative Research Method , 2011 .

[10]  C. Bhat Cyber Bullying: Overview and Strategies for School Counsellors, Guidance Officers, and All School Personnel , 2008, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[11]  T. Little,et al.  Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Frequency Among Finnish Youth , 2013, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[12]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[13]  E. Frydenberg,et al.  The Role of Peer Bystanders in School Bullying: Positive Steps Toward Promoting Peaceful Schools , 2005 .

[14]  D. Cross,et al.  Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010, Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health.

[15]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying: The right value of the phenomenon. Comments on the paper “Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon?” , 2012 .

[16]  D. Pepler,et al.  Individual Motivations and Characteristics Associated With Bystander Intervention During Bullying Episodes Among Children and Youth , 2012 .

[17]  Kimberly A. Parker,et al.  Inoculation's Efficacy With Young Adults' Risky Behaviors: Can Inoculation Confer Cross-Protection Over Related but Untreated Issues? , 2012, Health communication.

[18]  K. Bussey,et al.  The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyberbullying , 2015 .

[19]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Rethinking the Bystander Role in School Violence Prevention , 2006, Health promotion practice.

[20]  E. Frydenberg,et al.  Coping in the Cyberworld: Program Implementation and Evaluation – A Pilot Project , 2009, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[21]  C. Salmivalli Bullying and the peer group: A review , 2010 .

[22]  M. O'moore,et al.  Cyber-bullying: the situation in Ireland , 2012 .

[23]  Antonella Brighi,et al.  Positive uses of new technologies in relationships in educational settings , 2013 .

[24]  D. Olweus Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? , 2012 .

[25]  E. Renold,et al.  'I wanna tell you a story': Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people , 2000 .

[26]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  3. Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: how useful are the terms? , 2013 .

[27]  G. Espinoza,et al.  9. Methods used in cyberbullying research , 2013 .

[28]  Robert Thornberg,et al.  Moral disengagement in bullying , 2013 .

[29]  D. Cross,et al.  Australian covert bullying prevalence study , 2009 .

[30]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Cyberbullying: Neither an epidemic nor a rarity , 2012 .

[31]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations , 2004 .

[32]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Cyberbullying: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Be Going? , 2012 .

[33]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[34]  Robert Thornberg A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act , 2007 .

[35]  Tammy L. Sonnentag,et al.  An Exploration of Moral Rebelliousness with Adolescents and Young Adults , 2013 .

[36]  Marie-Louise Obermann Moral Disengagement Among Bystanders to School Bullying , 2011 .

[37]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[38]  Elisa Poskiparta,et al.  Bystanders Matter: Associations Between Reinforcing, Defending, and the Frequency of Bullying Behavior in Classrooms , 2011, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[39]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Conor Mc Guckin,et al.  Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents and schools , 2012 .

[41]  D. Cross,et al.  If It's about Me, Why Do It without Me? Genuine Student Engagement in School Cyberbullying Education. , 2015 .

[42]  Robert Slonje,et al.  The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[44]  M. Heene,et al.  The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Marilyn A. Campbell,et al.  Cyber Bullying: An Old Problem in a New Guise? , 2005, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[46]  James R. Porter,et al.  Children Who Help Victims of Bullying: Implications for Practice , 2011 .

[47]  Colette Langos,et al.  Cyberbullying: The Challenge to Define , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[48]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[49]  Dan Olweus Comments on cyberbullying article: A rejoinder , 2012 .

[50]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[51]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[52]  Maria Hughes,et al.  A two-method investigation of early adolescents' responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. , 2012, Journal of adolescence.

[53]  Iain Coyne,et al.  The role of the industry in reducing cyberbullying , 2013 .

[54]  Bruce D. Johnson,et al.  Behind the scenes: insights into the human dimension of covert bullying , 2008 .

[55]  S. Bauman,et al.  Principles of cyberbullying research: definitions, measures, and methodology , 2013 .

[56]  Robert Thornberg A Student in Distress: Moral Frames and Bystander Behavior in School , 2010, The Elementary School Journal.

[57]  Peter K. Smith Cyberbullying: Challenges and opportunities for a research program—A response to Olweus (2012) , 2012 .

[58]  S H Schwartz,et al.  Bystander anonymity and reactions to emergencies. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Donna Cross,et al.  Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying , 2017, New Media Soc..

[60]  Christiane Spiel,et al.  Prevention of Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization: Evaluation of the ViSC Social Competence Program , 2015 .

[61]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory , 2010 .

[62]  Elisa Poskiparta,et al.  Vulnerable Children in Varying Classroom Contexts: Bystanders' Behaviors Moderate the Effects of Risk Factors on Victimization , 2010 .

[63]  E. Turiel Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions , 2008 .