Collaboration Among Designers: Analysing an Activity for System Development

Workplace studies provide an important input to system development, yet there is no straightforward way of translating empirical results into requirements. This study contributes to the development of methods by reporting an activity theory based approach consisting of (i) field observations, (ii) modelling and (iii) a specific task analysis for system requirements. The research informed the further development of the Build-it system, a multi-user system designed to support co-located interaction between designers in engineering and architecture, and other stakeholders such as clients, operators, or inhabitants. The background research was conducted in four engineering companies and comprised of meeting observations, a questionnaire on design collaboration (n=94) and the analysis of 20 artefacts. The findings indicate that collaboration is of critical importance to the design process, and at least some of the tasks in engineering design could be supported by a system like Build-it. The task analysis for system requirements involved potential users from engineering but extended the scope to other domains, namely architecture and chemical process engineering (n=22). In all three domains a multi-user system like Build-it would be advantageous; however, the specific requirements varied more than expected. The study critically reflects on the use of generic concepts and the process of conducting research for the purpose of understanding work for design.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[3]  Kristina Lauche,et al.  Thinking and representing in design. , 2005 .

[4]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Introduction: Information Technology in Human Activity , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Heiner Dunckel,et al.  Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren , 1999 .

[6]  Hilda Tellioglu,et al.  Open Design Methodologies. Exploring Architectural Practice for Systems Design , 1998 .

[7]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Designs on objects: imaginative practice, aesthetic categorisation, and the design of multimedia archiving support , 2000, Digit. Creativity.

[8]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  BUILD-IT: A Computer Vision-based Interaction Technique for a Planning Tool , 1997, BCS HCI.

[9]  Klaus Ehrlenspiel,et al.  Integrierte Produktentwicklung : Methoden für Prozeßorganisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion , 1995 .

[10]  G. Dobbins,et al.  Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) , 2003 .

[12]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian C. Heath (eds.) , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[13]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Physical and Virtual Tools: Activity Theory Applied to the Design of Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Maia Engeli.  Bits and spaces : architecture and computing for physical, virtual, hybrid realms : 33 projects by Architecture and CAAD, ETH Zurich , 2001 .

[15]  Irene Greif,et al.  Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings , 1988 .

[16]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[17]  Albert Cherns,et al.  Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted , 1987 .

[18]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[19]  K. Lauche.  SKETCHING A STRATEGY: EARLY DESIGN IN DIFFERENT INDUSTRIAL SECTORS , 2003 .

[20]  Janice Redish,et al.  Task analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Design Artefacts: Towards a design-oriented epistemology , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[23]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group , 1992 .

[24]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[25]  Kristina Lauche,et al.  Researching and Developing Work Activities in Information Systems: Experiences and the Way Forward , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[26]  Clifton Forlines,et al.  Sharing and building digital group histories , 2002, CSCW '02.

[27]  Jonathan Earthy,et al.  The Benefits of Using ISO 13407: Human Centred Design Process for Interactive Systems , 2001, INTERACT.

[28]  Eric Blanco,et al.  Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[30]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[31]  John C. McCarthy.  The paradox of understanding work for design , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[33]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Workplace Studies: The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW , 2000 .

[34]  Peter Warr,et al.  The Study of Well-being, Behaviour and Attitudes. , 2002 .

[35]  Kristina Lauche.  Qualitätshandeln in der Produktentwicklung. Theoretisches Model, Analyseverfahren und Ergebnisse zu Förderungsmöglichkeiten , 2001 .

[36]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[37]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Activity Theory and the Practice of Design , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[38]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[39]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[40]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[41]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[42]  Clifton Forlines,et al.  Building and sharing digital group histories , 2002, CSCW '02.

[43]  Jacob Buur,et al.  The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design , 2002, TCHI.

[44]  Roy Davies,et al.  Adapting Virtual Reality for the Participatory Design of Work Environments , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Measurement in action: an activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Effort-saving product representations in design—results of a questionnaire survey , 2001 .

[47]  Olav W. Bertelsen.  Activity Walkthrough-a quick user interface evaluation without users , 2005 .

[48]  Oliver Strohm,et al.  Benutzerorientierte Software-Entwicklung , 1994 .

[49]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Embodied Practices of Engineering Work , 2000 .

[50]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[51]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[52]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[53]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[54]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[55]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 2-3, 2004 , 2004 .

[56]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design , 2000, TCHI.

[57]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  Roomware: Toward the Next Generation of Human- Computer Interaction Based on an Integrated Design of Real and Virtual Worlds , 2001 .