Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Pigeons' responses in the presence of two concurrently available (initial-link) stimuli produced one of two different (terminal-link) stimuli according to identical but independent variable-interval schedules. Responding in the mutually exclusive terminal links was reinforced with food according to fixed-ratio schedules for six pigeons and according to fixed-interval schedules for two pigeons. None of the pigeons matched the proportion of (choice) responses in the initial links to the proportion of the rates of reinforcement obtained during the terminal links. Instead, as the values of each of the terminal-link schedules were increased by a constant amount, the choice proportions for the stimulus associated with the smaller of the two values increased, even though the relative rates of reinforcement during the terminal links decreased. These results are incompatible with those from previous studies with aperiodic (variable-interval or variable-ratio) schedules. The present results do suggest, however, that in transforming aperiodic schedules into their periodic equivalents, it may be necessary to consider the size of the smallest interreinforcement interval comprising the terminal-link schedules.

[1]  E. Fantino Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  M. Davison Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on pigeons' preference for different fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E Fantino,et al.  The dissociation of discriminative and conditioned reinforcing functions of stimuli with changes in deprivation. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  P. Killeen On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  A J Neuringer,et al.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Some Data on the Discriminative Stimulus Hypothesis of Secondary Reinforcement , 1965 .

[8]  R. Herrnstein APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  E Fantino,et al.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E Fantino,et al.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R. Herrnstein SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.