The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology

Three-dimensional (3D) cell printing technology has provided a versatile methodology to fabricate cell-laden tissue-like constructs and in vitro tissue/pathological models for tissue engineering, drug testing and screening applications. However, it still remains a challenge to print bioinks with high viscoelasticity to achieve long-term stable structure and maintain high cell survival rate after printing at the same time. In this study, we systematically investigated the influence of 3D cell printing parameters, i.e. composition and concentration of bioink, holding temperature and holding time, on the printability and cell survival rate in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology. Rheological measurements were utilized to characterize the viscoelasticity of gelatin-based bioinks. Results demonstrated that the bioink viscoelasticity was increased when increasing the bioink concentration, increasing holding time and decreasing holding temperature below gelation temperature. The decline of cell survival rate after 3D cell printing process was observed when increasing the viscoelasticity of the gelatin-based bioinks. However, different process parameter combinations would result in the similar rheological characteristics and thus showed similar cell survival rate after 3D bioprinting process. On the other hand, bioink viscoelasticity should also reach a certain point to ensure good printability and shape fidelity. At last, we proposed a protocol for 3D bioprinting of temperature-sensitive gelatin-based hydrogel bioinks with both high cell survival rate and good printability. This research would be useful for biofabrication researchers to adjust the 3D bioprinting process parameters quickly and as a referable template for designing new bioinks.

[1]  Yongnian Yan,et al.  In Vitro Angiogenesis of 3D Tissue Engineered Adipose Tissue , 2009 .

[2]  G. Narsimhan,et al.  Characterization of gelation time and texture of gelatin and gelatin–polysaccharide mixed gels , 2003 .

[3]  D Stamatialis,et al.  Fabrication of three-dimensional bioplotted hydrogel scaffolds for islets of Langerhans transplantation , 2015, Biofabrication.

[4]  P. Dubruel,et al.  The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[5]  Marcy Zenobi-Wong,et al.  Printing thermoresponsive reverse molds for the creation of patterned two-component hydrogels for 3D cell culture. , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[6]  S. Hsu,et al.  Viscoelastic behaviour at the thermal sol-gel transition of gelatin , 1993 .

[7]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[8]  Deok‐Ho Kim,et al.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  Xi Chen,et al.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs highly uniform embryoid body formation , 2015, Biofabrication.

[10]  David Eglin,et al.  A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  F. Lin,et al.  Fabrication of viable tissue-engineered constructs with 3D cell-assembly technique. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[12]  M. Panouillé,et al.  Gelation behaviour of gelatin and alginate mixtures. , 2009 .

[13]  T. Hasan,et al.  A three-dimensional in vitro ovarian cancer coculture model using a high-throughput cell patterning platform. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[14]  F. Lin,et al.  Biomimetic injectable HUVEC‐adipocytes/collagen/alginate microsphere co‐cultures for adipose tissue engineering , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Liliang Ouyang,et al.  3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions , 2015, Biofabrication.

[16]  F. Guillemot,et al.  Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[17]  F. Lin,et al.  A biomimetic physiological model for human adipose tissue by adipocytes and endothelial cell cocultures with spatially controlled distribution , 2013, Biomedical materials.

[18]  Liliang Ouyang,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro , 2014, Biofabrication.

[19]  Dongsheng Liu,et al.  Rapid formation of a supramolecular polypeptide-DNA hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  M. Djabourov,et al.  All Gelatin Networks: 1. Biodiversity and Physical Chemistry† , 2002 .

[21]  U. Demirci,et al.  Acoustic picoliter droplets for emerging applications in semiconductor industry and biotechnology , 2006, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[22]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  F. Lin,et al.  Alginate and alginate/gelatin microspheres for human adipose-derived stem cell encapsulation and differentiation , 2012, Biofabrication.

[24]  Yongnian Yan,et al.  An cell-assembly derived physiological 3D model of the metabolic syndrome, based on adipose-derived stromal cells and a gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen matrix. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  Stuart K Williams,et al.  Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[26]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  T. Boland,et al.  Inkjet printing of viable mammalian cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[28]  K H Kang,et al.  Quantitative optimization of solid freeform deposition of aqueous hydrogels , 2013, Biofabrication.

[29]  F. Lin,et al.  Injectable cell/hydrogel microspheres induce the formation of fat lobule-like microtissues and vascularized adipose tissue regeneration , 2012, Biofabrication.