Distributed Control of Two Dimensional Vehicular Formations: Stability Margin Improvement by Mistuning

We consider distributed control of a large two-dimensional (planar) vehicular formation. An individual vehicle in the formation is assumed to be a fully actuated point mass. The control objective is to move the formation with a constant pre-specified velocity while maintaining constant inter-vehicle separation between any pair of nearby vehicles. The control law is distributed in the sense that the control action at each vehicle depends on the relative position measurements with nearby vehicles and its own velocity measurement. For this problem, a partial differential equation (PDE) model is derived to describe the spatio-temporal evolution of velocity perturbations for large number of vehicles, Nveh . The PDE model is used to deduce asymptotic formulae for the stability margin (absolute value of the real part of the least stable eigenvalue). We show that the stability margin of the closed loop decays to 0 as the number of vehicles increases, but the decay rate in 2D formation is much slower than in 1D platoons. In addition, the PDE is used to optimize the stability margin using a mistuning-based approach, in which the control gains of the vehicles are changed slightly from their nominal values. We show that the mistuning design reduces the loss of stability margin significantly even with arbitrarily small amount of mistuning. The results of the analysis with the PDE model are corroborated with numerical computation of eigenvalues with the state-space model of the vehicular formation.Copyright © 2009 by ASME

[1]  Herbert G. Tanner,et al.  Decentralized cooperative control of heterogeneous vehicle groups , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  P. Barooah,et al.  Error Amplification and Disturbance Propagation in Vehicle Strings with Decentralized Linear Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Using front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers , 1999 .

[4]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Mihailo R. Jovanovic,et al.  On the ill-posedness of certain vehicular platoon control problems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  R. D'Andrea,et al.  On avoiding saturation in the control of vehicular platoons , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[7]  M. Tomizuka,et al.  Control issues in automated highway systems , 1994, IEEE Control Systems.

[8]  C. Y. Cheng,et al.  Autonomous intelligent cruise control using both front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[9]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  P. Barooah,et al.  Graph Effective Resistance and Distributed Control: Spectral Properties and Applications , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  M. Pachter,et al.  Flight Test Results of Close Formation Flight for Fuel Savings , 2002 .

[12]  Peter M. Ludwig.  Formation Control For Multi-Vehicle Robotic Minesweeeping , 2000 .

[13]  Mihailo R. Jovanovic,et al.  Effect of topological dimension on rigidity of vehicle formations: Fundamental limitations of local feedback , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  K. R. Rajagopal,et al.  Information flow and its relation to the stability of the motion of vehicles in a rigid formation , 2006, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..