Value Sensitive Transfer (VST) of Systems Among Countries: Towards a Framework

Systems like large technical and operational networks are necessary in modern societies, yet they are costly and time-consuming to develop. Instead of countries and organizations having to build systems from scratch, the transfer of systems is becoming more common. Yet systems reflect the values of the societies in which they are built and of the designers who develop them. Public values differ among cultures and countries; this not only hinders the transfer of systems but results in a lack of their adoption and acceptance by the receiving country. This article investigates the case of the transfer of parliamentary webcasting/telecasting systems from the US to Pakistan to better understand the international transfer of e-government systems. Although the concept of systems transfer is simple, implementing the system within a different cultural setting was more complicated than initially anticipated. The transfer of the system was influenced by the political objectives and cultural differences. Value tensions were found, especially surrounding openness, transparency, and accountability. Hence, the authors propose broadening the perspective on the transfer and development of systems by taking value differences into consideration. Toward this purpose, a framework for designing Value Sensitive Transfers VST is proposed.

[1]  YangKaifeng Neoinstitutionalism and e-government , 2003 .

[2]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Information Technology, E-Government, and Institutional Change , 2003 .

[3]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , 2008 .

[4]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[5]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[6]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  National culture and the adoption of new technologies , 2008 .

[7]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government , 2007 .

[8]  Malik Aleem Ahmed,et al.  Social media for higher education in developing countries – An intercultural perspective , 2011 .

[9]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  E-Government Business Models for Public Service Networks , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[10]  E. Hall The dance of life : the other dimension of time , 1984 .

[11]  Malik Aleem Ahmed,et al.  Equilibrium for CMC systems' alteration — An intercultural perspective , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society.

[12]  James N. Danziger,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1] , 2002 .

[13]  R. Inglehart Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006 , 2008 .

[14]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[15]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Digital Era Governance , 2006 .

[16]  Ronald Inglehart,et al.  Globalization and postmodern values , 1999 .

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  D. Goulet Development: Creator and destroyer of values , 1992 .

[19]  Bruce J. Neubauer,et al.  Designing and Implementing E-Government Systems , 2006 .

[20]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[21]  Alfons Trompenaars,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business , 1993 .

[22]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[24]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Moral Methodology and Information Technology , 2009 .

[25]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[26]  Denis Goulet The Paradox of Technology Transfer. , 1975 .

[27]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[28]  Nasir Islam,et al.  Sifarish, Sycophants, Power and Collectivism: Administrative Culture in Pakistan , 2004 .

[29]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Book reviews , 2002 .

[30]  Kaifeng Yang,et al.  Neoinstitutionalism and E-Government , 2003 .

[31]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  E-democracy, E-Contestation and the Monitorial Citizen* , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[32]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Enacting State Websites: A Mixed Method Study Exploring E-Government Success in Multi-Organizational Settings , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[33]  Walter Gropius,et al.  Embassy of the United States , 1961 .

[34]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[35]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Building the Virtual State... or Not? , 2003 .

[36]  Unpan Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective , 2022 .

[37]  Ellie Valentine Pakistan Parliamentary Libraries: A Historical Excursion and Hopes for the Future , 2010, Libr. Trends.