Peptide-Cellulose Conjugates on Cotton-Based Materials Have Protease Sensor/Sequestrant Activity
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Vincent Edwards | Krystal R. Fontenot | Falk Liebner | Brian D. Condon | J. V. Edwards | F. Liebner | B. Condon | J. V. Edwards
[1] G. Schultz,et al. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[2] N. Miyamoto,et al. Functional porous carbon-ZnO nanocomposites for high-performance biosensors and energy storage applications. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[3] T. Lee,et al. Contact Angle and Wetting Properties , 2013 .
[4] A. Fisher,et al. In vitro assessment of water vapour transmission of synthetic wound dressings. , 1995, Biomaterials.
[5] T. Grzela,et al. Modulation of matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity by hydrofiber-foam hybrid dressing – relevant support in the treatment of chronic wounds , 2015, Central-European journal of immunology.
[6] Rachel Smith,et al. Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers , 2002, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[7] K. Harding,et al. Defective extracellular matrix reorganization by chronic wound fibroblasts is associated with alterations in TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and MMP-2 activity. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[8] R. Clark,et al. Overview and General Considerations of Wound Repair , 1998 .
[9] Yanbing Yang,et al. Aptamer-functionalized carbon nanomaterials electrochemical sensors for detecting cancer relevant biomolecules , 2018 .
[10] M. Carter,et al. Defining a new diagnostic assessment parameter for wound care: Elevated protease activity, an indicator of nonhealing, for targeted protease‐modulating treatment , 2016, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[11] D. Yager,et al. The proteolytic environment of chronic wounds , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[12] V. Falanga. Occlusive wound dressings. Why, when, which? , 1988, Archives of dermatology.
[13] Joachim Dissemond,et al. Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? , 2007, Archives of Dermatological Research.
[14] Tim R. Dargaville,et al. Sensors and imaging for wound healing: a review. , 2013, Biosensors & bioelectronics.
[15] E. Dabelsteen,et al. Proliferation and mitogenic response to PDGF-BB of fibroblasts isolated from chronic venous leg ulcers is ulcer-age dependent. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[16] J. V. Edwards,et al. Future Structure and Properties of Mechanism-Based Wound Dressings , 2006 .
[17] Krystal R. Fontenot,et al. Structure/Function Relations of Chronic Wound Dressings and Emerging Concepts on the Interface of Nanocellulosic Sensors , 2020 .
[18] E. Ayello,et al. Wound dressings: an evolving art and science. , 2012, Advances in skin & wound care.
[19] J. V. Edwards,et al. Synthesis and activity of NH2- and COOH-terminal elastase recognition sequences on cotton. , 1999, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.
[20] E. Togawa,et al. Crystal transition from cellulose II hydrate to cellulose II , 2011 .
[21] T. Serena. Development of a Novel Technique to Collect Proteases from Chronic Wounds. , 2014, Advances in wound care.
[22] J. Tarlton,et al. Use of modified superabsorbent polymer dressings for protease modulation in improved chronic wound care. , 2013, Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice.
[23] J. VincentEdwards. Protease Biosensors Based on Peptide-Nanocellulose Conjugates: From Molecular Design to Dressing Interface , 2016 .
[24] J. Evans,et al. The preclinical evaluation of the water vapour transmission rate through burn wound dressings. , 1987, Biomaterials.
[25] Krystal R. Fontenot,et al. Human neutrophil elastase peptide sensors conjugated to cellulosic and nanocellulosic materials: part I, synthesis and characterization of fluorescent analogs , 2016, Cellulose.
[26] Monica C. Concha,et al. Kinetic and structural analysis of fluorescent peptides on cotton cellulose nanocrystals as elastase sensors. , 2015, Carbohydrate polymers.
[27] J. V. Edwards,et al. Peptide conjugated cellulose nanocrystals with sensitive human neutrophil elastase sensor activity , 2013, Cellulose.
[28] G. Winter,et al. Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig , 1962, Nature.
[29] J. V. Edwards,et al. Thrombin Production and Human Neutrophil Elastase Sequestration by Modified Cellulosic Dressings and Their Electrokinetic Analysis , 2011, Journal of functional biomaterials.
[30] O. Stojadinović,et al. Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
[31] P. Kingshott,et al. Electrospun nanofibers as dressings for chronic wound care: advances, challenges, and future prospects. , 2014, Macromolecular bioscience.
[32] Krystal R. Fontenot,et al. Human neutrophil elastase detection with fluorescent peptide sensors conjugated to cellulosic and nanocellulosic materials: part II, structure/function analysis , 2016, Cellulose.
[33] J. Schroers,et al. Nanopatterned Bulk Metallic Glass Biosensors. , 2017, ACS Sensors.
[34] J. Vincent Edwards,et al. Preparation, Characterization and Activity of a Peptide-Cellulosic Aerogel Protease Sensor from Cotton , 2016, Sensors.
[35] R. Diegelmann,et al. Ability of chronic wound fluids to degrade peptide growth factors is associated with increased levels of elastase activity and diminished levels of proteinase inhibitors , 1997, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[36] John E. Murphy,et al. Global Substrate Profiling of Proteases in Human Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Reveals Consensus Motif Predominantly Contributed by Elastase , 2013, PloS one.
[37] J. Dumville,et al. A 'test and treat' strategy for elevated wound protease activity for healing in venous leg ulcers. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[38] Chengjun Zhou,et al. Comparative properties of cellulose nano-crystals from native and mercerized cotton fibers , 2012, Cellulose.
[39] T. Lindström,et al. Aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose with tunable oleophobicity , 2010 .
[40] J. V. Edwards,et al. Development of a Continuous Finishing Chemistry Process for Manufacture of a Phosphorylated Cotton Chronic Wound Dressing , 2009 .
[41] Marco Romanelli,et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management , 2003, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[42] Harry Brumer,et al. Cellulose-Based Biosensors for Esterase Detection. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.
[43] T. Phillips,et al. Choosing a Wound Dressing Based on Common Wound Characteristics. , 2016, Advances in wound care.
[44] Krystal R. Fontenot,et al. Structure/Function Analysis of Cotton-Based Peptide-Cellulose Conjugates: Spatiotemporal/Kinetic Assessment of Protease Aerogels Compared to Nanocrystalline and Paper Cellulose , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.
[45] B. Schyrr,et al. Fiber-optic protease sensor based on the degradation of thin gelatin films , 2015 .
[46] I. K. Cohen,et al. Modified cotton gauze dressings that selectively absorb neutrophil elastase activity in solution , 2001, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.
[47] R. Ulijn,et al. Hydrogels for the detection and management of protease levels. , 2010, Macromolecular bioscience.