Quality measures of a multicentre universal newborn hearing screening program in Malaysia

Objective To evaluate and discuss the outcomes of the universal newborn hearing screening program conducted at four public hospitals in Malaysia. Method A retrospective analysis of the universal newborn hearing screening database from each hospital was performed. The database consisted of 28,432 and 30,340 screening results of babies born in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Quality indicators (coverage rate, referral rate, return for follow-up rate, and ages at screening and diagnosis) were calculated. Results Overall coverage rate across the four hospitals was 75% in 2015 and 87.4% in 2016. Over the two years, the referral rates for the first screening ranged from 2.7% to 33.93% with only one hospital achieving the recommended benchmark of <4% in both years. The return for follow-up rates for each participating hospital was generally below the recommended benchmark of ≥95%. The mean age at screening was 3.9 ± 1.2 days and 3.3 ± 0.4 days, respectively. The mean age at diagnosis for 70 infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss was 4.7 ± 0.7 months in 2015 and 3.6 ± 0.9 months in 2016. Conclusions Quality measures for the universal newborn hearing screening program in four public hospitals in Malaysia were lower than the required standards. Nevertheless, some quality indicators showed statistically significant improvements over the two years. Next steps involve identifying and implementing the best practice strategies to improve the outcome measures and thus the quality of the program.

[1]  S. Z. Mukari,et al.  Knowledge and attitude on childhood hearing loss among mothers and mothers-to-be in urban and rural areas in Malaysia. , 2019, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[2]  James W. Hall,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a rural community-based pediatric hearing screening program integrating in-person and tele-diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[3]  M. Ralli,et al.  Universal newborn hearing screening in the Lazio region, Italy , 2018, Italian Journal of Pediatrics.

[4]  P. Matulat,et al.  Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany. , 2018, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  R. Mazlan,et al.  Knowledge and attitude of Malaysian healthcare professionals towards newborn hearing screening program , 2018 .

[6]  Huang Zhiwu,et al.  Neonatal hearing screening in remote areas of China: a comparison between rural and urban populations , 2017, The Journal of international medical research.

[7]  M. Ralli,et al.  Universal newborn hearing screening using A-TEOAE and A-ABR: The experience of a large public hospital. , 2018, Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine.

[8]  Chih-Ming Huang,et al.  Comparison of Newborn Hearing Screening in Well-Baby Nursery and NICU: A Study Applied to Reduce Referral Rate in NICU , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  E. Crossley,et al.  Identifying the Optimal Age to Perform Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss in Uganda , 2015, Annals of medical and health sciences research.

[10]  B. McPherson,et al.  Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option? , 2015, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[11]  Suhana Alam,et al.  Improved newborn hearing screening follow-up results in more infants identified. , 2014, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[12]  James W. Hall,et al.  Efficacy of a community-based infant hearing screening program utilizing existing clinic personnel in Western Cape, South Africa. , 2012, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[13]  D. Sidek,et al.  Outcome of a newborn hearing screening program in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia: the first five years , 2011, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[14]  F. Dekker,et al.  Newborn hearing screening vs later hearing screening and developmental outcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment. , 2010, JAMA.

[15]  M. Profant,et al.  Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants. , 2009, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[16]  L. Eisenberg,et al.  Newborn hearing screening speeds diagnosis and access to intervention by 20-25 months. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  B. Olusanya,et al.  Community-based infant hearing screening for early detection of permanent hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment , 2008, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[19]  Jackson Roush,et al.  Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs , 2007, Pediatrics.

[20]  A. Kumral,et al.  Feasibility of neonatal hearing screening program with two‐stage transient otoacoustic emissions in Turkey , 2007, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[21]  B. Olusanya,et al.  Progress towards early detection services for infants with hearing loss in developing countries , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[22]  J. Hearing Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. , 2000, Pediatrics.

[23]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Bamford,et al.  Effectiveness of Population-Based Newborn Hearing Screening in England: Ages of Interventions and Profile of Cases , 2006, Pediatrics.

[25]  S. Z. Mukari,et al.  A pilot project on hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening: lessons learned. , 2006, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[26]  N. Boo,et al.  Newborn hearing screening: experience in a Malaysian hospital. , 2006, Singapore medical journal.

[27]  Kuo-Sheng Lee,et al.  Comparison of Hearing Screening Programs between One Step with Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Two Steps with TEOAE and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[28]  S. Meier,et al.  Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. , 2004, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[29]  Welfare Agencies,et al.  Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. , 2000, American journal of audiology.

[30]  Matthew MacDonald,et al.  The New York State Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Demonstration Project: Ages of Hearing Loss Identification, Hearing Aid Fitting, and Enrollment in Early Intervention , 2000, Ear and hearing.