论文信息 - AT&T's Strategic Response to Competition: Why Not Preempt Entry? - 字舞流文

AT&T's Strategic Response to Competition: Why Not Preempt Entry?

The idea that a monopolist would adopt a pricing strategy to deter entry is found in a wide body of research. We explore why the monopolist in the American telephone industry, AT&T, did not pursue such a strategy when its initial patents expired.

Joan Nix | David Gabel | David J. Gabel | J. Nix

[1] C. Fischer. “Touch Someone”: The Telephone Industry Discovers Sociability , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[2] Robert W. Garnet. The telephone enterprise : the evolution of the Bell System's horizontal structure, 1876-1909 , 1985 .

[3] Paul R. Milgrom,et al. LIMIT PRICING AND ENTRY UNDER INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: AN EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS' , 1982 .

[4] Gerald W. Brock. The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure , 1981 .

[5] H. Simon,et al. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[6] F. Modigliani,et al. New Developments on the Oligopoly Front , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[7] J. March. Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[8] J. Wenders. Two Views of Applied Welfare Analysis: The Case of Local Telephone Service Pricing , 1990 .

[9] W. Baumol,et al. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[10] Gerardo R. Ungson,et al. Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. , 1984 .

[11] I. Pool,et al. The Social Impact of the Telephone , 1978 .

[12] J. March. Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice , 1979 .

[13] A. Kahn. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions , 1988 .