Hierarchical Bayesian calibration with reference priors : An application to airborne particulate matter monitoring data

During an USEPA study in the Phoenix area from 1995-1998, measurements from a federal reference method (FRM) monitor, calibrated in accordance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards, were available less frequently with levels of accuracy and bias that differed from a colocated non-FRM or equivalent monitor. Using the soil constituent of PM2.5 (particles of aerodynamic particle diameter less than 2.5 micrometers (μm)) as an illustration, a Bayesian hierarchical calibration model is developed that combines information from reference and equivalent monitors to produce a temporally resolved posterior distribution of the complete concentration time series. Mean concentrations are modeled using a regression structure that reflects the influence of meteorology. To account for bias in monitors relative to each other, the mean at the equivalent monitor is represented by the product of an unknown bias parameter times the unknown mean concentration at the reference monitor. Estimation of the bias parameter involves inference about the ratio of normal means as in the well-known Fieller-Creasy problem. A new multi-parameter reference prior is developed for this comparative calibration setting, permitting simultaneous inference about the underlying mean concentrations and the bias parameter. By using a Bayesian hierarchical approach, the posterior distribution of unknown pollutant concentrations conditional

[1]  M. Clyde,et al.  Health Effects of Air Pollution: A Statistical Review , 2003 .

[2]  Tong Li,et al.  Poisson regression models with errors-in-variables: implication and treatment , 2002 .

[3]  Ronald W. Williams,et al.  Personal exposures to PM2.5 mass and trace elements in Baltimore, MD, USA , 2001 .

[4]  M. Daniels,et al.  Assessing sources of variability in measurement of ambient particulate matter , 2001 .

[5]  Malay Ghosh,et al.  Bayesian and Likelihood Inference for the Generalized Fieller—Creasy Problem , 2001 .

[6]  Dale L. Zimmerman,et al.  Combining Temporally Correlated Environmental Data From Two Measurement Systems , 2000 .

[7]  F. Dominici,et al.  A measurement error model for time-series studies of air pollution and mortality. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[8]  S L Zeger,et al.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  G A Norris,et al.  Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix, 1995-1997. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[11]  James N. Pitts,et al.  Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications , 1999 .

[12]  K. Fitzgerald,et al.  NERL PM research monitoring platforms: Baltimore, Fresno, and Phoenix. Data report for February 1995--April 1998 , 1998 .

[13]  R. Wyzga,et al.  Air pollution and mortality: the implications of uncertainties in regression modeling and exposure measurement. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Edward A. Wasil Aspects of Uncertainty. A Tribute to D. V. Lindley , 1995 .

[15]  C. Robert,et al.  New Perspectives on Linear Calibration , 1994 .

[16]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[17]  Brunero Liseo,et al.  Elimination of nuisance parameters with reference priors , 1993 .

[18]  Christine Osborne,et al.  Statistical Calibration: A Review , 1991 .

[19]  Jiunn T. Hwang,et al.  The Nonexistence of 100$(1 - \alpha)$% Confidence Sets of Finite Expected Diameter in Errors-in-Variables and Related Models , 1987 .

[20]  David M. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .