Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies

Abstract For the actual implementation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, societal support is a crucial precondition. This paper describes an extensive study on the acceptance of CCS by stakeholders in the Netherlands and explores one of the determining factors in the acceptance of CCS by the lay public, i.e. the way the Dutch press perceives and portrays CCS. The stakeholder analysis shows that there is a positive attitude towards CCS by industry, government, and environmental NGOs, provided that the conditions they pose on the deployment of CCS are met. The content analysis of Dutch news articles conveys that the media portrayal of CCS is—to a certain extent—a balanced reflection of the way CCS is perceived by the stakeholders. Both analyses show that the concerns about CCS have not overshadowed the main promise that CCS is part of the solution to climate change. However, the current negative aspects of CCS as raised by different stakeholders and the media will remain if no action is taken. Therefore, the conditions posed on the use of CCS, as well as the actions required to meet these conditions, could function as a proxy for the ‘societal voice’, articulating the most important issues concerning the future acceptance of CCS technology.

[1]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[2]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[3]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  How aware is the public of carbon capture and storage , 2005 .

[4]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  An international comparison of public attitudes towards carbon capture and storage technologies , 2006 .

[5]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Preface , 1992 .

[6]  Susanna Hornig.  Reading risk: public response to print media accounts of technological risk , 1993 .

[7]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Social barriers in wind power implementation in The Netherlands: Perceptions of wind power entrepreneurs and local civil servants of institutional and social conditions in realizing wind power projects , 2007 .

[8]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate change 1995 - impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change : scientific-technical analyses , 1997 .

[9]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies , 2005 .

[10]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[11]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? , 2002, Commun. Res..

[12]  C. Ryan,et al.  Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing , 1991 .

[13]  John Paffenbarger.  Nuclear power in the OECD , 2001 .

[14]  M. Akai,et al.  Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology: A survey of public opinion to explore influential factors , 2005 .

[15]  C. W. Van den Herik.  Group support for policy making , 1998 .

[16]  Elizabeth Devlin,et al.  Factors Affecting Public Acceptance of Wind Turbines in Sweden , 2005 .

[17]  R. Schibeci,et al.  Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: Community Participation in Public Policy in Australia , 2003, Public understanding of science.

[18]  André Faaij,et al.  Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[19]  John Surrey,et al.  Opposition to nuclear power : A review of international experience , 1976 .

[20]  J. Kaldellis.  Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece , 2005 .

[21]  Clair Gough,et al.  Media framing of new technology, the case of carbon capture and storage , 2006 .

[22]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage: Tyndall , 2004 .

[24]  T. Eyck,et al.  The media and public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls? , 2005 .

[25]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[26]  Susan E. Pickett,et al.  Japan's nuclear energy policy: from firm commitment to difficult dilemma addressing growing stocks of plutonium, program delays, domestic opposition and international pressure , 2002 .

[27]  S. Shackley,et al.  Acceptability of CO 2 capture and storage A review of legal, regulatory, economic and social aspects of CO2 capture and storage , 2006 .

[28]  Joanna Isobel House,et al.  Climate change 2001 : synthesis report , 2001 .

[29]  Clair Gough,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the Media , 2006 .

[30]  Clair Gough,et al.  Towards a Multi-Criteria Methodology for Assessment of Geological Carbon Storage Options , 2006 .

[31]  J. J. Dooley,et al.  Who's talking? What are the issues? The media's portrayal of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in the United States , 2005 .

[32]  Jacqueline Sharp.  Public attitudes toward geological disposal of carbon dioxide in Canada , 2005 .

[33]  F. J. Bongers,et al.  Participatory Policy Analysis and Group Support Systems , 2000 .

[34]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Nuclear Energy and the Public , 1993 .

[35]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Environmental Sociology: Theory and Practice@@@Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective@@@Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology , 1997 .

[36]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[38]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .