Joint use of dynamical classifiers and ambiguity plane features

This paper argues for using ambiguity plane features within dynamic statistical models for classification problems. The relative contribution of the two model components are investigated in the context of acoustically monitoring cutter wear during milling of titanium, an application where it is known that standard static classification techniques work poorly. Experiments show that explicit modeling of long-term context via a hidden Markov model state improves performance, but mainly by using this to augment sparsely labelled training data. An additional performance gain is achieved by using the shorter-term context of ambiguity plane features.

[1]  Elijah Kannatey-Asibu,et al.  Tool Failure Monitoring in Turning by Pattern Recognition Analysis of AE Signals , 1988 .

[2]  Les E. Atlas,et al.  Optimizing time-frequency kernels for classification , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  Applications of time-frequency analysis to signals from manufacturing and machine monitoring sensors , 1996, Proc. IEEE.

[4]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Statistical Models in S , 1991 .

[5]  Lane M. D. Owsley,et al.  Self-organizing feature maps and hidden Markov models for machine-tool monitoring , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Ruxu Du,et al.  Automated Monitoring of Manufacturing Processes, Part 2: Applications , 1995 .

[7]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  Advances in Real-Time Monitoring of Acoustic Emissions , 1997 .

[8]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  The Application of the Wigner Distribution Function to Machine Tool Monitoring , 1992 .

[9]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  From HMM's to segment models: a unified view of stochastic modeling for speech recognition , 1996, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[11]  Les E. Atlas,et al.  Data-driven time-frequency classification techniques applied to tool-wear monitoring , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[12]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Control of Machining Processes , 1993 .

[13]  Larry P. Heck,et al.  Mechanical system monitoring using hidden Markov models , 1991, [Proceedings] ICASSP 91: 1991 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  Les E. Atlas,et al.  Hidden Markov models for monitoring machining tool-wear , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[15]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Sensor Integration Using Neural Networks for Intelligent Tool Condition Monitoring , 1990 .