Object- and pixel-based analysis for mapping crops and their agro-environmental associated measures using QuickBird imagery

Currently, monitoring of agrarian policy actions usually requires ground visits to sample targeted farms, a time-consuming and very expensive procedure. To improve this, we have undertaken a study of the accuracy of five supervised classification methods (Parallelepiped, Minimum Distance, Mahalanobis Classifier Distance, Spectral Angle Mapper and Maximum Likelihood) using multispectral and pan-sharpened QuickBird imagery. We sought to verify whether remote sensing offers the ability to efficiently identify crops and agro-environmental measures in a typical agricultural Mediterranean area characterized by dry conditions. A segmentation of the satellite data was also used to evaluate pixel, object and pixel+object as minimum information units for classification. The results indicated that object- and pixel+object-based analyses clearly outperformed pixel-based analyses, yielding overall accuracies higher than 85% in most of the classifications and exhibiting the Maximum Likelihood of being the most accurate classifier. The accuracy for pan-sharpened image and object-based analysis indicated a 4% improvement in performance relative to multispectral data.

[1]  G. Hill,et al.  Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: A comparison of aerial photography, Landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery , 2001 .

[2]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Predicting tillage practices and agricultural soil disturbance in north central Montana with Landsat imagery , 2006 .

[3]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[4]  C. O'Hara,et al.  Concepts of Image Fusion in Remote Sensing Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  P. G. Earwicker,et al.  Multiresolution analysis of remotely sensed imagery , 1991 .

[6]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[7]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery , 2006 .

[8]  Chenghai Yang,et al.  Comparison of QuickBird Satellite Imagery and Airborne Imagery for Mapping Grain Sorghum Yield Patterns , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[9]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  A comparison of three image-object methods for the multiscale analysis of landscape structure , 2003 .

[10]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Assessing land-use in olive groves from aerial photographs , 2004 .

[11]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  W. Mehl,et al.  Land degradation, soil erosion and desertification monitoring in Mediterranean ecosystems , 1995 .

[13]  Jiaguo Qi,et al.  Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices , 2004 .

[14]  Charles C. Brunner,et al.  Image segmentation algorithms applied to wood defect detection , 2003 .

[15]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Data Fusion. Definitions and Architectures - Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolutions , 2002 .

[16]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  Urban land cover classification from high resolution multi-spectral IKONOS imagery , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[17]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Vegetative filter strips for reducing atrazine and sediment runoff transport , 2003 .

[18]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[19]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Introduction of sensor spectral response into image fusion methods. Application to wavelet-based methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Data fusion , 2009, CSUR.

[21]  Rafael García,et al.  Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Determining temporal windows for crop discrimination with remote sensing: a case study in south-eastern Australia , 2004 .

[23]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: Steps toward validating global map products , 1999 .

[24]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[25]  Nikos Koutsias,et al.  Object-based classification using Quickbird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site , 2008 .

[26]  R. Kettig,et al.  Classification of Multispectral Image Data by Extraction and Classification of Homogeneous Objects , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[27]  Agustin Lobo,et al.  Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of land cover units in ecology , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Myeong-Ryong Nam,et al.  Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic Satellite images using the curvelet transform , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[29]  S. Franklin,et al.  OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS OF IKONOS-2 IMAGERY FOR EXTRACTION OF FOREST INVENTORY PARAMETERS , 2006 .

[30]  Toshiharu Kojima,et al.  Forest type classification using data fusion of multispectral and panchromatic high-resolution satellite imageries , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[31]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[32]  E. Fereres,et al.  Evaluating the impact of soil management on soil loss in olive orchards , 2003 .

[33]  D. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery , 2002 .