Why organizations continue to create patient information leaflets with readability and usability problems: an exploratory study.

Readability and usability problems with patient information leaflets continue to be reported despite long-standing recognition of their existence and the availability of guidelines for developing health education materials. This exploratory study examined possible causes for such problems, based on interviews with professionals who developed leaflets in large health organizations. Findings suggest that readability is an important concern for developers, but that complex organizational processes are involved in creating leaflets, and that developers face a need to cope with organizational politics, goal conflicts and various other pressures. Six factors were identified, i.e. (1) initiators, (2) intended users and contexts of use, (3) goals, (4) work flow and content decisions, (5) readability considerations, and (6) evaluation practices, that can adversely affect the content, organization, and resulting comprehensibility and usability of leaflets. It is suggested to adopt a broad ecological view of the environments in which patient education materials are created and deployed. Implications for practice and for future related research are discussed.

[1]  Harm J. G. Zwaga,et al.  Visual Information For Everyday Use : Design And Research Perspectives , 1999 .

[2]  P. Ley.  Comprehension, memory and the success of communications with the patient , 1972 .

[3]  R. Flesch.  The Art of Readable Writing , 1974 .

[4]  L. Osman,et al.  Asthma leaflets for patients: what do asthma nurses use? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  T. Hardie,et al.  Readability of advance directive documents. , 1997, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[6]  Angie Tagtow,et al.  Extent to Which Dietitians Evaluate Nutrition Education Materials , 2000 .

[7]  M Duman,et al.  Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Enhancing the readability of materials describing genetic risk for breast cancer. , 2004, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[9]  L M Kirk,et al.  Patient education pamphlets about prevention, detection, and treatment of breast cancer for low literacy women. , 1996, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  Denise Polit-O'Hara,et al.  Nursing Research: Principles and Methods , 1978 .

[11]  D. Nutbeam.  Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century , 2000 .

[12]  H. Glick,et al.  Implementation and Impact of the Patient Self Determination Act: Preliminary Survey and Proposals for Change , 1996 .

[13]  O. Kirksey,et al.  Assessment of Selected Patient Educational Materials of Various Chain Pharmacies , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[14]  Sandra McGregor,et al.  What information patients with localised prostate cancer hear and understand. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Nursing Research: The Application of Qualitative Approaches , 1985 .

[16]  Thomas M. Duffy.  Readability Formulas: What's the Use? , 1985 .

[17]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Strategies to improve cancer education materials. , 1996, Oncology nursing forum.

[18]  Shortell Sm.  Community health improvement approaches: accounting for the relative lack of impact. , 2000 .

[19]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Printed Health Education Materials: Which Features Lead to Which Outcomes? , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[20]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Linguistic complexity and text comprehension : readability issues reconsidered , 1989 .

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization. , 1998, Health services research.

[23]  Shirley Large,et al.  Written information given to patients and families by palliative care units: a national survey , 2000, The Lancet.

[24]  I. Purves,et al.  A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. , 1998, Family practice.

[25]  F. Stevenson.  The strategies used by general practitioners when providing information about medicines. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[26]  David Sless.  Designing and evaluating forms in large organizations , 1998 .

[27]  P. Ley,et al.  Communicating with Patients: Improving Communication, Satisfaction and Compliance , 1988 .

[28]  M. Dixon-Woods.  The production of printed consumer health information: order from chaos? , 2000 .

[29]  Readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions given to patients in Scotland. , 2004, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[30]  Theo Boersema,et al.  Cooperation between graphic designers and applied behavioural researchers , 1998 .

[31]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Reading ability in patients in substance misuse treatment centers. , 1993, The International journal of the addictions.

[32]  J. Dollahite,et al.  Readability of printed sources of diet and health information. , 1996, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  T. Davis,et al.  The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. , 1990, The Journal of family practice.