Presence and Absence in Education VR: The Role of Perceptual Seduction in Conceptual Learning

Recently developed information technology, such as interactive multimedia and virtual reality, has a profound impact the way people deal with information. Often, they engender a strong feeling of presence, of being an active part of the reality that is portrayed. It is this feeling of presence that differentiates the new learning technologies from the old; and it is this same feeling of presence which is both their greatest strength and their most severe weakness. In this paper, we discuss the respective roles of presence and also of absence in relation to virtual worlds designed for learning, and to existing theories of learning. We characterise absence as a psychological focus on conceptual processing, and presence as a psychological focus on direct perceptual processing (of things which are present in the current environment). We suggest that virtual worlds tend to elicit a sense of presence because they present information as directly perceptible objects and spaces, rather than as linguistic specifications requiring conceptual processing if they are to be understood. To investigate this idea, a series of experiments was conducted in which the degree to which information was specified as objects or text was varied. An account of our findings is followed by a description of our model of the role of presence and absence in virtual environments designed to encourage conceptual learning. We conclude by suggesting that effective conceptual learning in virtual worlds depends on designs that support both perceptual and conceptual processing – worlds that provide both the necessary perceptual cues to elicit a sense of presence, and that contain a sufficient element of surprise to break the spell periodically and so foster conceptual learning. The resulting changes in how students deal with relevant knowledge promise to make classroom learning less exclusively conceptual, but also less fragile, and more like learning in the world outside.

[1]  R. Bowen Loftin,et al.  The Development of a Virtual world for Learning Newtonian Mechanics , 1994, MHVR.

[2]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  A Model for Information Exploration , 1991, Hypermedia.

[3]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Role of a Mental Model in Learning to Operate a Device. , 1984 .

[4]  John Waterworth,et al.  Creativity and Sensation: The Case for Synaesthetic Media , 1997 .

[5]  D. Gelernter.  The Muse in the Machine: Computerizing the Poetry of Human Thought , 2002 .

[6]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds , 1996, CHI.

[7]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[8]  John Waterworth,et al.  Personal Spaces: 3D Spatial Worlds for Information Exploration, Organisation and Communication , 1996 .

[9]  Sissel Guttormsen Schär.  The influence of the user interface on solving well- and ill-defined problems , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[13]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  S. Rose.  The Making Of Memory , 1992 .

[15]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Role of a Mental Model in Learning to Operate a Device , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Richard Mander,et al.  A “pile” metaphor for supporting casual organization of information , 1992, CHI.

[17]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Spatial hypertext: designing for change , 1995, CACM.

[18]  Mats Lind,et al.  The art of the obvious , 1992, CHI.

[19]  Alison Kidd,et al.  The marks are on the knowledge worker , 1994, CHI '94.

[20]  Philip J. Stokes,et al.  Creativity and psychopathology , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[22]  J. Waterworth.  Technology in Support of Returning : From Conscious Doing to Consciously Being , 1998 .

[23]  Earl Rennison,et al.  Galaxy of news: an approach to visualizing and understanding expansive news landscapes , 1994, UIST '94.

[24]  M. Boden.  Creativity and unpredictability , 1995 .

[25]  H. Dreyfus.  Mind Over Machine , 1986 .

[26]  John A. Waterworth,et al.  A Pattern of Islands: Exploring Public Information Space in a Private Vehicle , 1994, MHVR.

[27]  Robert A. Prentky,et al.  Creativity and psychopathology , 1980 .

[28]  L. Smith,et al.  To be or Not to Be , 1957, Journal of psychiatric nursing and mental health services.

[29]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Presence as Being-in-the-World , 1998, Presence.

[31]  John M. Flach,et al.  Critical Ratios as Behavioural Indices of Presence , 1999 .

[32]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[33]  John E. Laird,et al.  Symbolic architectures for cognition , 1989 .

[34]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[35]  Andreas Dieberger.  Providing Spatial Navigation for the World Wide Web , 1995, COSIT.

[36]  Thomas W. Schubert.  Decomposing the sense of presence : Factor analytic insights , 1999 .

[37]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994 .

[38]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[39]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .