Phenomics: unlocking the hidden genetic variation for breaking the barriers in yield and stress tolerance

The rate of genetic gain in yield, quality, input use efficiency and adaptability of crops to biotic and abiotic stresses must be improved significantly to achieve global food and nutritional security by 2050. To achieve this goal, deciphering the physiological genetic basis and assembly of component traits through analytical breeding is necessary. The two pillars of analytical breeding are genotyping and phenotyping. Advances in genotyping technologies such as single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and genotyping by sequencing have made deep genotyping cheaper and quicker, while phenotyping has lagged behind and thus remains a rate limiting step. Recently, phenomics has emerged as a new way of accurately phenotyping large set of genotypes. Phenomics employ non-invasive sensors and advanced computational platforms for non-destructive and high-throughput phenotyping. The depth of component phenotypic traits and the spatio-temporal dynamic phenotypic data generated in phenomics are enormous and unparallel to the conventional phenotyping. The utility of phenomics in QTL mapping and genome-wide association studies has already been demonstrated in important food crops. Phenomics has high potential for phenome-wide association studies, genomics selection models for enhancing selection efficiency, and genetic-ecophysiological crop simulation models for prediction of genotype-phenotypes relationship, in silico phenotyping and ideotype design. With the advancement in the depth of phenome data acquisition and analyses capabilities of phenomics, phenome assisted breeding and phenomic selection is anticipated to be a reality in near future. Complementary use of conventional phenotyping and advanced phenomics is suggested to assist in fundamental discoveries and analytical crop breeding.

[1]  M. Mahner,et al.  What exactly are genomes, genotypes and phenotypes? And what about phenomes? , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  M. Grant,et al.  The RPM1 plant disease resistance gene facilitates a rapid and sustained increase in cytosolic calcium that is necessary for the oxidative burst and hypersensitive cell death. , 2000, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[3]  Jian-Kang Zhu,et al.  Screening for Gene Regulation Mutants by Bioluminescence Imaging , 2002, Science's STKE.

[4]  C. Sabatti,et al.  The Human Phenome Project , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[5]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  H. Scharr,et al.  A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[7]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale , 2009, Neuroscience.

[9]  Da-Wen Sun Infrared spectroscopy for food quality analysis and control , 2009 .

[10]  Jian-Kang Zhu,et al.  RNA-directed DNA methylation and demethylation in plants , 2009, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences.

[11]  Ross A Frick,et al.  Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants , 2011, Plant Methods.

[12]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[13]  Yusheng Yang,et al.  Investigation of cell wall composition related to stem lodging resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by FTIR spectroscopy , 2012, Plant signaling & behavior.

[14]  K. Kersting,et al.  Early drought stress detection in cereals: simplex volume maximisation for hyperspectral image analysis. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[15]  D. Leister Retrograde signaling in plants: from simple to complex scenarios , 2012, Front. Plant Sci..

[16]  J. Borevitz,et al.  Natural Genetic Variation for Growth and Development Revealed by High-Throughput Phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2012, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[17]  R. Sunkar,et al.  Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. , 2012, Trends in plant science.

[18]  Zhaolei Zhang,et al.  PhenoM: a database of morphological phenotypes caused by mutation of essential genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  R. Tuberosa Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era , 2012, Front. Physio..

[20]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  J. Reif,et al.  Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[22]  J. Reif,et al.  Genetic dynamics underlying phenotypic development of biomass yield in triticale , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[23]  Paul R Zurek,et al.  3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M. Livny,et al.  High-Throughput Computer Vision Introduces the Time Axis to a Quantitative Trait Map of a Plant Growth Response , 2013, Genetics.

[25]  J. Foley,et al.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050 , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[27]  H. Bohnert,et al.  The Role of the Epigenome in Gene Expression Control and the Epimark Changes in Response to the Environment , 2014 .

[28]  Matthew R. Tucker,et al.  Mapping dynamic QTL for plant height in triticale , 2014, BMC Genetics.

[29]  Junfei Gu,et al.  Linking ecophysiological modelling with quantitative genetics to support marker-assisted crop design for improved yields of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought stress. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[30]  L. Xiong,et al.  Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice , 2014, Nature Communications.

[31]  V. Chinnusamy,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants , 2014 .

[32]  V. Allard,et al.  Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  C. Klukas,et al.  Dissecting the Phenotypic Components of Crop Plant Growth and Drought Responses Based on High-Throughput Image Analysis[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[34]  Chlorophyll fluorescence emission can screen cold tolerance of cold acclimated Arabidopsis thaliana accessions , 2014, Plant Methods.

[35]  R. Ortiz,et al.  Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[36]  M. Tester,et al.  High-Throughput Phenotyping to Detect Drought Tolerance QTL in Wild Barley Introgression Lines , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[38]  T. Palosuo,et al.  Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[39]  S. Christensen,et al.  Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  Johanna A Bac-Molenaar,et al.  Genome-wide association mapping of growth dynamics detects time-specific and general quantitative trait loci , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[41]  Malia A. Gehan,et al.  A Versatile Phenotyping System and Analytics Platform Reveals Diverse Temporal Responses to Water Availability in Setaria. , 2015, Molecular plant.

[42]  J. Verdeil,et al.  Secondary Metabolite Localization by Autofluorescence in Living Plant Cells , 2015, Molecules.

[43]  Qing-Yong Yang,et al.  Systems Genetic Validation of the SNP-Metabolite Association in Rice Via Metabolite-Pathway-Based Phenome-Wide Association Scans , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[44]  K. H. Kjaer,et al.  3D Laser Triangulation for Plant Phenotyping in Challenging Environments , 2015, Sensors.

[45]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Utilization of a high-throughput shoot imaging system to examine the dynamic phenotypic responses of a C4 cereal crop plant to nitrogen and water deficiency over time , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[46]  Avi C. Knecht,et al.  Integrating Image-Based Phenomics and Association Analysis to Dissect the Genetic Architecture of Temporal Salinity Responses in Rice1[OPEN] , 2015, Plant Physiology.

[47]  Huwaida S. Rabie,et al.  Combining field performance with controlled environment plant imaging to identify the genetic control of growth and transpiration underlying yield response to water-deficit stress in wheat , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[48]  S. S. Ray,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Agriculture , 2015 .

[49]  Grégoire M. Hummel,et al.  LeasyScan: a novel concept combining 3D imaging and lysimetry for high-throughput phenotyping of traits controlling plant water budget , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[50]  Malia A. Gehan,et al.  Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[51]  Huan-Wei Huang,et al.  Dicer-independent RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis , 2016, Cell Research.

[52]  R. Sahoo,et al.  Measuring leaf area index from colour digital image of wheat crop , 2016 .

[53]  Carolyn J. Lawrence-Dill,et al.  The Quest for Understanding Phenotypic Variation via Integrated Approaches in the Field Environment1[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Physiology.

[54]  W. Kruijer,et al.  Phenomics for photosynthesis, growth and reflectance in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals circadian and long-term fluctuations in heritability , 2016, Plant Methods.

[55]  D. Roden,et al.  Phenome-Wide Association Studies as a Tool to Advance Precision Medicine. , 2016, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[56]  Christian Bauckhage,et al.  Plant Phenotyping using Probabilistic Topic Models: Uncovering the Hyperspectral Language of Plants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[57]  J. Mervis NSF director unveils big ideas, with an eye on the next president and Congress , 2016 .

[58]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[59]  Yunbi Xu,et al.  Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[60]  J. Mervis SCIENCE POLICY. NSF director unveils big ideas. , 2016, Science.