End-user and clinician perspectives on the viability of wearable functional electrical stimulation garments after stroke and spinal cord injury

Purpose: Functional electrical stimulation (FES), through repetitive training (FES-therapy) or continuous assistance (neuro-prosthesis), can restore motor function after paralysis due to spinal cord injury or stroke. With current technology, patients are often incapable of independently applying FES, thereby limiting its use. Novel FES-garments with embedded stimulation electrodes were developed in collaboration with Myant, Canada, to address this problem. The purpose of this study was to collect the views of future end-users to inform the refinement of the device design and to obtain insights on subsequent commercialization of this rehabilitation and assistive technology. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken to determine the needs of potential users (patients and clinicians; n = 19). Participant took part in interviews or focus groups after a presentation of the garments. An inductive content analysis was used to generate the themes from the data and identify data saturation. Results: The identified themes and sub-themes were: (1) User Perspectives: users' characteristics (needs, limitations), expected benefits (beliefs), and anticipated problems (fears); (2) Device Design: technical features, usability, and disadvantages of the garment, cables, stimulator, software, and interface; (3) Acquisition Process: organizational procedures (acquisition and adoption steps); and (4) Business Model: financial and strategic aspects to facilitate commercialization and support users. Conclusions: The insights obtained from end-users and clinicians provide guidelines to optimize the development of novel FES-garments, and strategies for bringing the device to the market. The themes identified can serve to inform other rehabilitation and assistive technology developers with processes and ideas on how to meet these groups' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Participants with neurological paralysis have interest and critical views on new rehabilitation and assistive technology, and the repercussions of using new technologies to address their function, health and wellbeing. The FES-garment design presented appeared acceptable to the end-users, pending resolution of certain shortcomings (wiring, operating duration, robustness, easiness to don and doff). End-users and clinicians had specific views regarding the acquisition process of new technologies (training, customization, and follow-up/support), which are important to take into consideration to ensure broad stakeholders uptake.

[1]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Technology for mobility in SCI 10 years from now , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[3]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  MUNDUS project: MUltimodal Neuroprosthesis for daily Upper limb Support , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  N. Leech,et al.  Toward More Rigor in Focus Group Research: A New Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Focus Group Data , 2009 .

[5]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[6]  C. A. Dairaghi,et al.  Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  M. Molinari,et al.  Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Helen Christensen,et al.  Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Program for Suicidal Thinking in an Australian Community Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  A. Tokuhiro,et al.  Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  J. S. French,et al.  What do Spinal Cord Injury Consumers Want? A Review of Spinal Cord Injury Consumer Priorities and Neuroprosthesis from the 2008 Neural Interfaces Conference , 2010, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[11]  Rita K Bode,et al.  Course of functional improvement after stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Effects on body composition , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[13]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  K. Dunning,et al.  An exploratory study of gait and functional outcomes after neuroprosthesis use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  P. Taylor,et al.  Upper limb functional electrical stimulation devices and their man–machine interfaces , 2015, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[16]  Eduardo Rocon,et al.  Advances in selective activation of muscles for non-invasive motor neuroprostheses , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Hiroyuki Miyasaka,et al.  Review of devices used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation , 2017, Medical devices.

[18]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[20]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  M. Galea,et al.  Does early exercise attenuate muscle atrophy or bone loss after spinal cord injury? , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[22]  Ifeoma Nwogu,et al.  Reported use of technology in stroke rehabilitation by physical and occupational therapists , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[23]  M. Popovic,et al.  Garments for functional electrical stimulation: Design and proofs of concept , 2019, Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering.

[24]  R. Jackson,et al.  Muscle atrophy is prevented in patients with acute spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[25]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development , 2014 .

[26]  W. Miller,et al.  A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Stroke.

[27]  Jane Burridge,et al.  The Views of People with Spinal Cord Injury about the Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2009 .

[28]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Allen Dobson,et al.  Economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: a claims-based retrospective cohort study, 2011–2014 , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  Owen Howlett,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Amy L Shortal Recovery of Walking Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1996 .

[32]  A. Batavia,et al.  Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  A. Heijboer,et al.  Effect of training intensity on physical capacity, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in early rehabilitation of spinal cord injured individuals , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[34]  Jessica P McCabe,et al.  Recovery of Coordinated Gait , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance , 2014, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[36]  B. Andrews,et al.  The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury - observed benefits during gait studies , 1993, Paraplegia.

[37]  N. Leech,et al.  A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research , 2009 .

[38]  F. Rabiee Focus-group interview and data analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[39]  Thilo Kroll,et al.  Staying physically active after spinal cord injury: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to exercise participation , 2009, BMC public health.

[40]  M. Popovic,et al.  Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. , 2013, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada.

[41]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) May Modify the Poor Prognosis of Stroke Survivors with Severe Motor Loss of the Upper Extremity: A Preliminary Study , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[42]  K. Musselman,et al.  Physical Therapists' Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for Clients With Stroke: Frequency, Barriers, and Facilitators , 2015, Physical Therapy.

[43]  Janice J Eng,et al.  The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[44]  Albert H Vette,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury. , 2014, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[45]  B. S. Henthorn Disengagement and reinforcement in the elderly. , 1979, Research in nursing & health.

[46]  Alarcos Cieza,et al.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[47]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Early rehabilitation after stroke , 2017, Current opinion in neurology.

[48]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in The Netherlands. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[49]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[50]  Kenneth J Hunt,et al.  High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses bone loss in people with chronic spinal cord injury. , 2008, Bone.

[51]  T. Yan,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery of the Lower Extremity and Walking Ability of Subjects With First Acute Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2005, Stroke.

[52]  José Zariffa,et al.  Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: translational potential of current trends , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[53]  J. Mcdonald,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury:: from theory to practice. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[54]  L. Baillie,et al.  Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study , 2018, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.