Investigating the Effects of Anthropomorphic Fidelity of Self-Avatars on Near Field Depth Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments

Immersive Virtual Environments (IVEs) are becoming more accessible and more widely utilized for training. Previous research has shown that the matching of visual and proprioceptive information is important for calibration. While research has demonstrated that self-avatars can enhance ones' sense of presence and improve distance perception, the effects of self-avatar fidelity on near field distance estimations has yet to be investigated. This study tested the effect of avatar fidelity on the accuracy of distance estimations in the near-field. Performance with a virtual avatar was also compared to real-world performance. Three levels of fidelity were tested; 1) an immersive self-avatar with realistic limbs, 2) a low-fidelity self-avatar showing only joint locations, and 3) end-effector only. The results suggest that reach estimations become more accurate as the visual fidelity of the avatar increases, with accuracy for high fidelity avatars approaching real-world performance as compared to low-fidelity and end-effector conditions. In all conditions reach estimations became more accurate after receiving feedback during a calibration phase.

[1]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[2]  Scott L. Thomas,et al.  Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Recalibration of Perceived Distance in Virtual Environments Occurs Rapidly and Transfers Asymmetrically Across Scale , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  François Conti,et al.  Virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery: technologies and evolution. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Uwe Kloos,et al.  The influence of eye height and avatars on egocentric distance estimates in immersive virtual environments , 2011, APGV '11.

[7]  T. Foulsham.  Eye movements and their functions in everyday tasks , 2015, Eye.

[8]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Effect of Viewing a Self-Avatar on Distance Judgments in an HMD-Based Virtual Environment , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality , 2012, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[10]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Analyzing the effect of a virtual avatar's geometric and motion fidelity on ego-centric spatial perception in immersive virtual environments , 2009, VRST '09.

[11]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[12]  Betsy Williams Sanders,et al.  Distance perception in virtual environments , 2008, APGV '08.

[13]  Bliss M. Altenhoff,et al.  Effects of visual and proprioceptive information in visuo-motor calibration during a closed-loop physical reach task in immersive virtual environments , 2014, SAP.

[14]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Effects of Stereo Viewing Conditions on Distance Perception in Virtual Environments , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[15]  N. Seymour.  VR to OR: A Review of the Evidence that Virtual Reality Simulation Improves Operating Room Performance , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[16]  Adam R. Richardson,et al.  The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments , 2005 .

[17]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The influence of avatar (self and character) animations on distance estimation, object interaction and locomotion in immersive virtual environments , 2011, APGV '11.

[18]  Romeo Chua,et al.  On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. , 1998 .

[19]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[20]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[21]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[22]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Calibration to tool use during visually-guided reaching. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Visuo-Haptic Feedback on Physical Reaching Behaviors During 3D Interaction in Real and Immersive Virtual Environments , 2016, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[24]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[25]  David C Knill,et al.  Visual Feedback Control of Hand Movements , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Robert S. Stawski,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition) , 2013 .

[27]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[28]  Klaus H. Hinrichs,et al.  Gradual transitions and their effects on presence and distance estimation , 2010, Comput. Graph..

[29]  K. Boivin,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Peripheral Vision for the Control of Movement , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  P. Bliese.  Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[32]  Bliss M. Altenhoff,et al.  Carryover effects of calibration to visual and proprioceptive information on near field distance judgments in 3D user interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[33]  M. Slater,et al.  Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Amy Banic,et al.  That Avatar Is Looking at Me! Social Inhibition in Virtual Worlds , 2010, IVA.

[35]  J. Edward Swan,et al.  Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Effects of Handling Real Objects and Self-Avatar Fidelity on Cognitive Task Performance and Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.