Tailoring material properties of a nanofibrous extracellular matrix derived hydrogel

In the native tissue, the interaction between cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) is essential for cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, mechanical stability, and signaling. It has been shown that decellularized ECMs can be processed into injectable formulations, thereby allowing for minimally invasive delivery. Upon injection and increase in temperature, these materials self-assemble into porous gels forming a complex network of fibers with nanoscale structure. In this study we aimed to examine and tailor the material properties of a self-assembling ECM hydrogel derived from porcine myocardial tissue, which was developed as a tissue specific injectable scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. The impact of gelation parameters on ECM hydrogels has not previously been explored. We examined how modulating pH, temperature, ionic strength, and concentration affected the nanoscale architecture, mechanical properties, and gelation kinetics. These material characteristics were assessed using scanning electron microscopy, rheometry, and spectrophotometry, respectively. Since the main component of the myocardial matrix is collagen, many similarities between the ECM hydrogel and collagen gels were observed in terms of the nanofibrous structure and modulation of properties by altering ionic strength. However, variation from collagen gels was noted for the gelation temperature along with varied times and rates of gelation. These discrepancies when compared to collagen are likely due to the presence of other ECM components in the decellularized ECM based hydrogel. These results demonstrate how the material properties of ECM hydrogels could be tailored for future in vitro and in vivo applications.

[1]  Donald O Freytes,et al.  Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[2]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  William R Wagner,et al.  Intra-myocardial biomaterial injection therapy in the treatment of heart failure: Materials, outcomes and challenges. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  Amran K. Asadi,et al.  pH effects on collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: Electrostatic interactions and phosphate binding , 2009 .

[5]  J. Guan,et al.  Hydrogels for Cardiac Tissue Engineering , 2011 .

[6]  P. Panine,et al.  Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physicochemical study. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Randall J Lee,et al.  Biomaterials for the treatment of myocardial infarction. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Leor,et al.  Cells, scaffolds, and molecules for myocardial tissue engineering. , 2005, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[9]  G. Pilkington,et al.  Extracellular matrix proteins inhibit proliferation, upregulate migration and induce morphological changes in human glioma cell lines. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[10]  D. Hu,et al.  Design and characterization of an injectable pericardial matrix gel: a potentially autologous scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[11]  Yugyung Lee,et al.  Biomedical applications of collagen. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[12]  Jennifer M. Singelyn,et al.  Injectable Materials for the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: The Promise of Decellularized Matrices , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular translational research.

[13]  Jason A Burdick,et al.  Engineering on the straight and narrow: the mechanics of nanofibrous assemblies for fiber-reinforced tissue regeneration. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[14]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Synthesis and physicochemical characterization of end-linked poly(ethylene glycol)-co-peptide hydrogels formed by Michael-type addition. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[15]  S. Badylak,et al.  Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  O. Latinovic,et al.  Structural and micromechanical characterization of type I collagen gels. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  I. Yannas,et al.  Recent advances in tissue synthesis in vivo by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[19]  Jennifer M. Singelyn,et al.  Naturally derived myocardial matrix as an injectable scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[20]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[21]  David G Simpson,et al.  Nanofiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[22]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  K. Wilson,et al.  Characterisation of electrospun polystyrene scaffolds for three-dimensional in vitro biological studies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[24]  Jennifer M. Singelyn,et al.  Modulation of material properties of a decellularized myocardial matrix scaffold. , 2011, Macromolecular bioscience.

[25]  Diane Hu,et al.  Injectable hydrogel scaffold from decellularized human lipoaspirate. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  B. Alberts,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell (Fifth Edition) , 2008 .

[27]  J. Rosenblatt,et al.  Injectable collagen as a pH-sensitive hydrogel. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[28]  G. Keller,et al.  Simple and High Yielding Method for Preparing Tissue Specific Extracellular Matrix Coatings for Cell Culture , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Rheology and confocal reflectance microscopy as probes of mechanical properties and structure during collagen and collagen/hyaluronan self-assembly. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[30]  D. Mooney,et al.  Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[31]  W. Park,et al.  Collagen-based biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds: preparation and characterization of collagen/silk fibroin bicomponent nanofibrous structures. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[32]  G. C. Wood,et al.  The formation of fibrils from collagen solutions. 1. The effect of experimental conditions: kinetic and electron-microscope studies. , 1960, The Biochemical journal.

[33]  J. Paul Robinson,et al.  Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Joseph W Freeman,et al.  Collagen self-assembly and the development of tendon mechanical properties. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Diego Mantovani,et al.  Tailoring Mechanical Properties of Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering: The Effects of pH, Temperature and Ionic Strength on Gelation , 2010 .

[37]  J. Paul Robinson,et al.  Small Intestinal Submucosa: A Tissue-Derived Extracellular Matrix That Promotes Tissue-Specific Growth and Differentiation of Cells in Vitro , 1998 .

[38]  A. Pogorelov,et al.  Evaluation of collagen gel microstructure by scanning electron microscopy , 2010, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[39]  K. Piez,et al.  Collagen fibril formation. Evidence for a multistep process. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  L. Brown Cardiac extracellular matrix: a dynamic entity. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[41]  I R Titze,et al.  Viscosities of Implantable Biomaterials in Vocal Fold Augmentation Surgery , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[42]  S. Badylak,et al.  Biocompatibility of small-intestinal submucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. , 1994, Journal of endourology.

[43]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[44]  J. P. Robinson,et al.  Time-lapse confocal reflection microscopy of collagen fibrillogenesis and extracellular matrix assembly in vitro. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[45]  D. Ingber,et al.  How cells (might) sense microgravity , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[46]  T. Hayashi,et al.  Factors affecting the interactions of collagen molecules as observed by in vitro fibril formation. III. Non-helical regions of the collagen molecules. , 1974, Journal of biochemistry.

[47]  A A Poot,et al.  Preparation and evaluation of molecularly-defined collagen-elastin-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[48]  Changyong Wang,et al.  Injectable cardiac tissue engineering for the treatment of myocardial infarction , 2010, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[49]  François Berthod,et al.  Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications , 2010, Materials.

[50]  J. A. Chapman,et al.  Collagen fibril formation. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[51]  J. Harris,et al.  Influence of saline and pH on collagen type I fibrillogenesis in vitro: fibril polymorphism and colloidal gold labelling. , 2007, Micron.

[52]  K. Piez,et al.  Collagen fibril formation. Optimal in vitro conditions and preliminary kinetic results. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[53]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.