Shifting forest landownership interests over the life-course of female forest landowners in rural Georgia, United States

[1]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Exploring links between education, forest management intentions, and economic outcomes in light of gender differences in the United States , 2022, Forest Policy and Economics.

[2]  Sarah P. Church,et al.  Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes: a co-produced research agenda , 2022, Socio-Ecological Practice Research.

[3]  A. Mook,et al.  A critical assessment of participation in stakeholder engagement in agrifood system research , 2022, Socio-Ecological Practice Research.

[4]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Conservation Intentions and Place Attachment among Male and Female Forest Landowners* , 2022, Rural Sociology.

[5]  P. Johansen,et al.  Landowners rural embeddedness , 2022, Journal of Rural Studies.

[6]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Satisfaction of Family Forest Landowners with Forest-Management Services in Georgia, United States , 2021, Trees, Forests and People.

[7]  Š. Bojnec,et al.  Gender and the environmental concerns of young farmers: Do young women farmers make a difference on family farms? , 2021, Journal of Rural Studies.

[8]  N. Tian,et al.  Nonindustrial private forest landowner perspectives on forest certification: A look at awareness and barriers , 2021 .

[9]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Perspectives of four stakeholder groups about the participation of female forest landowners in forest management in Georgia, United States , 2021, PloS one.

[10]  D. Adams,et al.  Economic and Ethical Motivations for Forest Restoration and Incentive Payments , 2021, Society & Natural Resources.

[11]  J. Chamberlain,et al.  Producers, production, marketing, and sales of non-timber forest products in the United States: a review and synthesis , 2021, Agroforestry Systems.

[12]  W. Luppold,et al.  REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF U.S. SAWN HARDWOOD PRODUCT PRICES FROM 2000 TO 2020 , 2021, BioProducts Business.

[13]  K. Hamunen,et al.  Towards gender equality in family forestry: building self-efficacy together with other female forest owners , 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research.

[14]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Exploring Environmental Attitudes and Forest Program Uptake with Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners in Michigan , 2020 .

[15]  S. Nandigama.  Performance of success and failure in grassroots conservation and development interventions: Gender dynamics in participatory forest management in India , 2020 .

[16]  C. Bailey,et al.  Taking Goldschmidt to the Woods: Timberland Ownership and Quality of Life in Alabama* , 2020, Rural Sociology.

[17]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  How Do African American and White Family Forest Landowners Conceptualize Forest Legacy in Georgia, United States? , 2020, Small-scale Forestry.

[18]  J. Filipiak,et al.  Power dynamics of the non-operating landowner-renter relationship and conservation decision-making in the Midwestern United States , 2020 .

[19]  J. L. Willis,et al.  Public and forest landowner attitudes towards longleaf pine ecosystem restoration using prescribed fire , 2020 .

[20]  Susana Ferreira,et al.  Towards a Characterization of Working Forest Conservation Easements in Georgia, USA , 2020, Forests.

[21]  Daowei Zhang,et al.  A theoretical and empirical analysis of joint forest production: Timber supply and amenity services , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.

[22]  E. Markowitz,et al.  Northeastern Family Forest Owner Gender Differences in Land-Based Estate Planning and the Role of Self-Efficacy , 2020 .

[23]  V. Dale,et al.  Opportunities and attitudes of private forest landowners in supplying woody biomass for renewable energy , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[24]  D. Adams,et al.  Public Attitudes about Private Forest Management and Government Involvement in the Southeastern United States , 2019, Forests.

[25]  S. Allred,et al.  Factors associated with family forest owner actions: A vote-count meta-analysis , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[26]  Steven A. Brieger.  Social Identity and Environmental Concern: The Importance of Contextual Effects , 2019 .

[27]  J. Arvai,et al.  Will Millennials save the world? The effect of age and generational differences on environmental concern. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Jennifer E. Givens,et al.  At home, in public, and in between: gender differences in public, private and transportation pro-environmental behaviors in the US Intermountain West , 2019, Environmental Sociology.

[29]  Angie Carter.  “We Don’t Equal Even Just One Man”: Gender and Social Control in Conservation Adoption , 2019, Society & Natural Resources.

[30]  S. B. Jack,et al.  Wildlife habitat condition in open pine woodlands: Field data to refine management targets , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[31]  Puskar N. Khanal,et al.  Obstacles to participation in carbon sequestration for nonindustrial private forest landowners in the southern United States: A diffusion of innovations perspective , 2019, Forest Policy and Economics.

[32]  Kim‐Pong Tam,et al.  Cross-National Variation of Gender Differences in Environmental Concern: Testing the Sociocultural Hindrance Hypothesis , 2019 .

[33]  E. Kennedy,et al.  Is there an “ideal feeder”? How healthy and eco-friendly food consumption choices impact judgments of parents , 2019, Agriculture and Human Values.

[34]  C. Godar,et al.  Factors influencing the use of consulting foresters by non-industrial private forest landowners in Mississippi , 2018 .

[35]  R. Congalton,et al.  Characterizing Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowners' Forest Management Engagement and Advice Sources , 2018, Society & Natural Resources.

[36]  M. Gibbert,et al.  “He likes playing the hero – I let her have fun shooting”. Gender games in the Italian forest during the hunting season , 2018, Journal of Rural Studies.

[37]  T. Hujala,et al.  How are forest owners' objectives and social networks related to successful conservation? , 2018, Journal of Rural Studies.

[38]  S. Tibbetts,et al.  Life-course theory , 2018, The Routledge Companion to Criminological Theory and Concepts.

[39]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  C. Bailey,et al.  Millions of Acres, Billions of Trees: Socioecological Impacts of Shifting Timberland Ownership† , 2018 .

[41]  J. Filipiak,et al.  Women Agricultural Landowners—Past Time to Put Them “On the Radar” , 2018 .

[42]  G. Domke,et al.  The role of reforestation in carbon sequestration , 2017, New Forests.

[43]  K. ASHERa,et al.  Gender in the jungle : a critical assessment of women and gender in current ( 2014 – 2016 ) forestry research , 2018 .

[44]  R. Germain,et al.  Impacts of Forestry Best Management Practices on Logging Costs and Productivity in the Northeastern USA , 2017 .

[45]  P. Deuffic,et al.  Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries , 2017 .

[46]  A. McCright,et al.  Gender Differences in Environmental Concern : Sociological explanations , 2017 .

[47]  Emily Huff,et al.  A National Perspective on Women Owning Woodlands (WOW) Networks , 2017, Journal of Extension.

[48]  T. Hujala,et al.  Gender in European forest ownership and management: reflections on women as “New forest owners” , 2017 .

[49]  B. Butler,et al.  The Role of Gender in Management Behaviors on Family Forest Lands in the United States , 2017 .

[50]  B. Butler,et al.  Family Forest Owner Characteristics Shaped by Life Cycle, Cohort, and Period Effects , 2016, Small-scale Forestry.

[51]  B. Butler,et al.  Family Forest Ownerships of the United States, 2013: Findings from the USDA Forest Service's National Woodland Owner Survey , 2016 .

[52]  A. Milman,et al.  Understanding Family Forest Land Future Ownership and Use: Exploring Conservation Bequest Motivations , 2016, Small-scale Forestry.

[53]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Awareness of Aesthetic and Other Forest Values: The Role of Forestry Knowledge and Education , 2015 .

[54]  Piper Coutinho-Sledge.  Feminized Forestry: The Promises and Pitfalls of Change in a Masculine Organization , 2015 .

[55]  Burney Fischer,et al.  Why agree to a conservation easement? Understanding the decision of conservation easement granting , 2015 .

[56]  P. Bettinger,et al.  Spatial Forest Harvest Scheduling for Areas Involving Carbon and Timber Management Goals , 2015 .

[57]  S. Workman,et al.  Non-timber forest products and forest stewardship plans , 2015 .

[58]  J. Uusivuori,et al.  Effects of gender and length of land tenure on timber supply in Finland , 2014 .

[59]  D. Hodges,et al.  Factors Related with Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners' Forest Conversion Decision in Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee , 2014 .

[60]  R. Nawrotzki,et al.  Cohort change and the diffusion of environmental concern: a cross-national analysis , 2013, Population and environment.

[61]  Joy A. Schneer,et al.  Pathways to retirement: A career stage analysis of retirement age expectations , 2013 .

[62]  B. Butler,et al.  Forest ownership dynamics of southern forests , 2013 .

[63]  B. Wells,et al.  One size does not fit all: Customizing conservation to a changing demographic , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[64]  Nimai Das.  Can gender-sensitive forestry programmes increase women’s income? Lessons from a forest fringe community in an Indian province , 2011 .

[65]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners' willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy , 2011 .

[66]  G. C. Shivan,et al.  Factors influencing nonindustrial private forest landowners' policy preference for promoting bioenergy , 2010 .

[67]  D. Laband,et al.  Motivations and Land-Use Intentions of Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners: Comparing Inheritors to Noninheritors , 2009, Forest Science.

[68]  Karl Ulrich Mayer,et al.  New Directions in Life Course Research , 2009 .

[69]  Scott Reeves,et al.  An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[70]  B. Woike,et al.  Content coding of open-ended responses. , 2007 .

[71]  Audrey L. Mayer,et al.  Conservation implications of exporting domestic wood harvest to neighboring countries , 2006 .

[72]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[73]  Axel Franzen.  Riley E. Dunlap, Frederick H. Buttel, Peter Dickens und August Gijswijt (Hg.): Sociological theory and the environment. Classical foundations, contemporary insights , 2004 .

[74]  M. Reed.  Marginality and gender at work in forestry communities of British Columbia, Canada , 2003 .

[75]  D. Wear,et al.  Decisions Nonindustrial Forest Landowners Make: An Empirical Examination , 2003 .

[76]  J. Herbohn,et al.  Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: What’s in a name? , 2002, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy.

[77]  M. Ollikainen,et al.  Bequest Intentions of Forest Landowners: Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2002 .

[78]  D. Dillman.  The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .