Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime

Highly clustered event sequences are observed in certain types of crime data, such as burglary and gang violence, due to crime-specific patterns of criminal behavior. Similar clustering patterns are observed by seismologists, as earthquakes are well known to increase the risk of subsequent earthquakes, or aftershocks, near the location of an initial event. Space–time clustering is modeled in seismology by self-exciting point processes and the focus of this article is to show that these methods are well suited for criminological applications. We first review self-exciting point processes in the context of seismology. Next, using residential burglary data provided by the Los Angeles Police Department, we illustrate the implementation of self-exciting point process models in the context of urban crime. For this purpose we use a fully nonparametric estimation methodology to gain insight into the form of the space–time triggering function and temporal trends in the background rate of burglary.

[1]  R. Cowan An introduction to the theory of point processes , 1978 .

[2]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[3]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns , 1988 .

[4]  J. Simonoff Multivariate Density Estimation , 1996 .

[5]  M. Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life , 1998 .

[6]  Y. Ogata Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .

[7]  George E. Tita,et al.  Diffusion in Homicide: Exploring a General Method for Detecting Spatial Diffusion Processes , 1999 .

[8]  P. Eggermont,et al.  Maximum penalized likelihood estimation , 2001 .

[9]  D. Vere-Jones,et al.  Stochastic Declustering of Space-Time Earthquake Occurrences , 2002 .

[10]  Ken Pease,et al.  Prospective hot-spotting - The future of crime mapping? , 2004 .

[11]  P. Larsen Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimation, Volume I, Density Estimation , 2004 .

[12]  W. Bernasco,et al.  How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice , 2005 .

[13]  Jiancang Zhuang,et al.  Second‐order residual analysis of spatiotemporal point processes and applications in model evaluation , 2006 .

[14]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  The Impact of Gang Formation on Local Patterns of Crime , 2007 .

[15]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Space–Time Patterns of Risk: A Cross National Assessment of Residential Burglary Victimization , 2007 .

[16]  D. Marsan,et al.  Extending Earthquakes' Reach Through Cascading , 2008, Science.

[17]  Esko Valkeila,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Volume II: General Theory and Structure, 2nd Edition by Daryl J. Daley, David Vere‐Jones , 2008 .

[18]  Spencer Ch The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime , 2008 .

[19]  Shane D. Johnson Repeat burglary victimisation: a tale of two theories , 2008 .

[20]  George E. Tita,et al.  Measuring and Modeling Repeat and Near-Repeat Burglary Effects , 2009 .

[21]  D. Sornette,et al.  Limits of declustering methods for disentangling exogenous from endogenous events in time series with foreshocks, main shocks, and aftershocks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Olivier Lengliné,et al.  A new estimation of the decay of aftershock density with distance to the mainshock , 2010 .