Union membership in the Netherlands: A cross-sectional analysis

In this paper we analyze the determinants of union membership in the Netherlands. Not only the unionization decision is studied, but also the decision which confederation the workers will join. Furthermore, a test is presented to determine the nature of the decision process; we ask whether the decision to join a union and the decision which confederation to join are sequential or simultaneous decisions. The answer is not only of consequence for the model specification, but also affects the conclusions drawn from the estimations.In our analysis we find a considerable number of significant variables, most of them with the expected sign. If a variable has an effect contrary to expectation this can largely be attributed to specific Dutch circumstances. This shows that a general theory on the determinants of union membership can never be wholly universal, but always has to allow for nationally determined exceptions.Our results further demonstrate the importance of careful specification of the structure of the decision process. The comparison of the results of the multinomial and the sequential logit model show that misspecification of the decision structure can lead to false conclusions. In the Netherlands, the decision to become a union member is taken prior to the decision which particular union to join.

[1]  W. J. Moore,et al.  On the Prospects for American Trade Union Growth: A Cross-Section Analysis , 1975 .

[2]  J. Fiorito,et al.  Determinants of U.S. Unionism: Past Research and Future Needs , 1982 .

[3]  George Sayers Bsin,et al.  AN INTER‐INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF UNIONISATION IN BRITAIN* , 1979 .

[4]  H. Farber,et al.  Why Workers Want Unions: The Role of Relative Wages and Job Characteristics , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  A. Booth Estimating the Probability of Trade Union Membership: A Study of Men and Women in Britain , 1986 .

[6]  Mark C. Berger,et al.  Union Membership Determination and Industry Characteristics , 1984 .

[7]  G. Bain,et al.  Trade Union Membership in Great Britain: An Individual-level Analysis* , 1985 .

[8]  Gregory M. Duncan,et al.  Wage Determination in the Union and Nonunion Sectors: A Sample Selectivity Approach , 1980 .

[9]  R. R. Kornhauser Some social determinants and consequences of union membership , 1961 .

[10]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Do Union Members Receive Compensating Wage Differentials? Reply , 1982 .

[11]  R. Freeman Individual Mobility and Union Voice in the Labor Market , 1976 .

[12]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[13]  Lung-fei Lee Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables , 1978 .

[14]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[15]  Alan A. Carruth,et al.  Empirical Modelling of Trade Union Growth in Germany, 1956—1986: Traditional versus Cointegration and Error Correction Methods , 1990 .

[16]  G. Hundley Education and Union Membership , 1988 .

[17]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[18]  O. Ashenfelter,et al.  Unionism, Relative Wages, and Labor Quality in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1972 .

[19]  J. Shister The Logic of Union Growth , 1953, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  James G. Scoville Influences on Unionization in the U.S. in 1966 , 1971 .

[21]  B. Hirsch,et al.  The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence , 1986 .