Combining magnitude and shape features for hyperspectral classification

The spectral angle mapper (SAM) and maximum likelihood classification (MLC) are two traditional classifiers for hyperspectral classification. This paper presents two methods to combine magnitude and shape features, one for each classifier. As the magnitude and shape features are complementary, combining both features can improve the classification accuracy. First, magnitude features are represented by the spectral radiance vector, whereas shape features are represented by the spectral gradient vector. Then, in SAM, each feature vector generates a spectral angle for each class. The two generated angles are added together to obtain a single similarity, which is used for the final classification. Similarly, in MLC, after the dimensionality reduction using Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD), each feature vector in the new feature space generates a likelihood. The two generated likelihoods are multiplied to obtain a single value, which is adopted for the final classification. Experimental results on an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) data set demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform the methods with a single feature set.

[1]  K. Carder,et al.  Absorption Spectrum of Phytoplankton Pigments Derived from Hyperspectral Remote-Sensing Reflectance , 2004 .

[2]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Hierarchical classifier design in high-dimensional numerous class cases , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Toward an Optimal SVM Classification System for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  John A. Richards,et al.  Cluster-space representation for hyperspectral data classification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Victor Haertel,et al.  Experiments on feature extraction in remotely sensed hyperspectral image data , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[6]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing , 2005 .

[8]  F. Meer Spectral curve shape matching with a continuum removed CCSM algorithm , 2000 .

[9]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[11]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[12]  Vassilia Karathanassi,et al.  Hyperspectral data and methods for coastal water mapping , 2006, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[13]  Mark J. Carlotto Spectral shape classification system for Landsat thematic mapper , 1996, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  J. Chen,et al.  A pairwise decision tree framework for hyperspectral classification , 2007 .

[15]  A. Mazer,et al.  Image processing software for imaging spectrometry data analysis , 1988 .

[16]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[17]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A fast two-stage classification method for high-dimensional remote sensing data , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Sang Wook Lee,et al.  Spectral gradient: a material descriptor invariant to geometry and incident illumination , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  J. Sweet,et al.  The spectral similarity scale and its application to the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[21]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Hierarchical Classification In High Dimensional, Numerous Class Cases , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  G. Shaw,et al.  Signal processing for hyperspectral image exploitation , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[23]  Cheng Wang,et al.  A multiresolution spectral angle‐based hyperspectral classification method , 2008 .

[24]  John A. Richards,et al.  Efficient maximum likelihood classification for imaging spectrometer data sets , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  M. Schlerf,et al.  Classification of coniferous tree species and age classes using hyperspectral data and geostatistical methods , 2005 .

[26]  John A. Richards,et al.  Binary coding of imaging spectrometer data for fast spectral matching and classification , 1993 .

[27]  Minimum-norm method without eigendecomposition , 1994, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[28]  N. Keshava,et al.  Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Adaptive feature selection for hyperspectral data analysis using a binary hierarchical classifier and tabu search , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[31]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Fast likelihood classification , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[32]  F. Meer Analysis of spectral absorption features in hyperspectral imagery , 2004 .