Affordances and Effects of Promoting eParticipation Through Social Media

A growing body of literature highlights the adoption of social media for eParticipation, focusing on the identification of processes and structures through which ICT supports the relationship between citizens, governments and public bodies. There is a need to better understand the role of technology in such initiatives. This paper addresses this issue by introducing the concept of affordance. We used a case study approach to investigate an Indonesian eParticipation projects from Bandung, identifying affordance perceptions, enabling and inhibiting factors, actualized affordances and affordances effects. From the use of social media we identify nine actualized affordances and their effects, and we discuss the relationship between them. The case introduces findings from a developing country, a context that has largely been ignored within eParticipation research. Our findings provide lessons learned for practitioners on how to organize their eParticipation projects, as well as for researchers identifying future research avenues to strengthen our understanding of the role of ICT by introducing the concept of affordances.

[1]  F. Caeldries Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[2]  Jan Recker,et al.  Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations , 2013, MIS Q..

[3]  Bengisu Tulu,et al.  A Theory of Organization-EHR Affordance Actualization , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Foundations of Digital Government: Leading and Managing in the Digital Era , 2013 .

[5]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Jan Recker,et al.  Understanding the Actualization of Affordances: A Study in the Process Modeling Context , 2013, ICIS.

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[9]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[10]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011) , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Disruptive information system innovation: the case of internet computing , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Foundations of Digital Government , 2014 .

[13]  C. Michaels Affordances: Four Points of Debate , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[14]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[15]  Johannes A.G.M. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. , 2000 .

[16]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-Associated Organizational Change Processes , 2013, MIS Q..

[18]  Paolo Spagnoletti,et al.  Applying media synchronicity theory to distance learning in virtual worlds: a design science approach , 2014 .

[19]  S. Borins,et al.  A Holistic View of Public Sector Information Technology , 2005 .

[20]  Claudio Vitari,et al.  Affordance Theory in the IS Discipline: a Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2014, AMCIS.

[21]  S. A. Ahsan Rajon,et al.  An effective framework for implementing electronic governance in developing countries: Bangladesh perspective , 2011, 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2011).

[22]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[23]  Claudio Vitari,et al.  Business Model in the IS Discipline: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2016 .

[24]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .