Assessment of dune failure along the Dutch coast using a fully probabilistic approach

Abstract This paper describes an investigation into the added value of a fully probabilistic approach to dune resilience assessment over the currently applied deterministic and semi-probabilistic approaches. The method is applied to the Dutch coast but is generically applicable, provided of course the sufficient availability of data. The DUROS+ model in its most basic form was used to quantitatively assess dune resilience. The Monte Carlo method was used for the probabilistic investigation. Important research questions were (1) where can the DUROS+ model in combination with the fully probabilistic approach be applied along the Dutch coast? and (2) what is the alongshore variability of failure probability using this probabilistic approach? The main conclusion of the work presented in this paper is that the fully probabilistic approach provides valuable added insight with respect to the actual failure probability of transects. At the same time it is noted that the current dune erosion model in its most basic form is not able to cover all of the Dutch coast. Reasons lie in the availability of sufficient quality boundary conditions, applicability limits associated with model assumptions and insufficient quality coastal profile information. To extend the coverage of the analysis of failure probabilities along the Dutch coast it is recommended (1) to involve more process-based model concepts that can cope with the situations DUROS+ cannot, and (2) to expand currently available data on boundary conditions.

[1]  J. Graaff Sediment concentration due to wave action , 1988 .

[2]  Jr. Asbury H. Sallenger Storm Impact Scale for Barrier Islands , 2000 .

[3]  J. Graaff,et al.  Dune erosion during a storm surge , 1977 .

[4]  Henk J. Steetzel Cross-shore Transport during Storm Surges , 1993 .

[5]  M.R.A. van Gent,et al.  Analysis of dune erosion processes in large-scale flume experiments , 2008 .

[6]  D. Dantzig Economic decision problems for flood prevention , 1956 .

[7]  James R. Walker,et al.  HONOLULU REEF RUNWAY DIKE , 1970 .

[8]  Ap van Dongeren,et al.  82. MICORE: DUNE EROSION AND OVERWASH MODEL VALIDATION WITH DATA FROM NINE EUROPEAN FIELD SITES , 2009 .

[9]  Marcel J. F. Stive,et al.  Holocene storm surge signatures in the coastal dunes of the western Netherlands , 1995 .

[10]  Fedor Baart,et al.  OpenEarth - Inter-Company Management of: Data, Models, Tools & Knowledge , 2010 .

[11]  M.R.A. van Gent,et al.  Large-scale dune erosion tests to study the influence of wave periods , 2008 .

[12]  G. Stelling,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model , 2004 .

[13]  Leo C. van Rijn,et al.  Prediction of dune erosion due to storms , 2009 .

[14]  Penny J Johnes,et al.  AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , 2013 .

[15]  J. Steers,et al.  Holocene Sea Level Changes in the Netherlands , 1962 .

[16]  Pier Vellinga,et al.  Beach and dune erosion during storm surges , 1982 .

[17]  J. K. Vrijling,et al.  Probabilistic design of water defense systems in The Netherlands , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  C. Starr Social benefit versus technological risk. , 1969, Science.

[19]  D. Roelvink,et al.  Modelling storm impacts on beaches, dunes and barrier islands , 2009 .

[20]  R. Holman,et al.  A simple model for the spatially-variable coastal response to hurricanes , 2007 .

[21]  E. M. Coeveld,et al.  Dune erosion - product 3: Probabilistic dune erosion prediction method , 2007 .

[22]  Randall A. Wise,et al.  Sbeach: Numerical Model for Simulating Storm-Induced Beach Change, Report 3 : User's manual , 1989 .

[23]  J. Graaff Probabilistic design of dunes; an example from the Netherlands , 1986 .

[24]  Ronald L. Wasserstein,et al.  Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications , 1997 .