A radiographic analysis of degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level.

OBJECT Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) is common and has generally been characterized as a homogeneous disease entity in the literature and in clinical practice. Because disease variability has not been carefully characterized, stratification of treatment recommendations based on scientific evidence is currently lacking. In this study, the authors analyzed radiographic parameters of patients with LDS at the L4-5 level to better characterize this entity. METHODS Demographic data were collected from 304 patients (200 women and 104 men) with LDS at the L4-5 level. Plain radiographs including anteroposterior, lateral, and flexion-extension lateral radiographs were analyzed for disc height, segmental angulation, segmental translation, and osteophyte formation. Correlations were sought between the variables of age, sex, disc height, segmental angulation, segmental translation, and osteophyte formation. RESULTS The mean patient age was 63.8 years (range 40-86 years). The mean mid-disc height was 7 mm (range 0-14 mm) on the neutral lateral view. The mean angulation between the superior endplate of L-5 and the inferior endplate of L-4 was 6° of lordosis (range 13° of kyphosis to 23° lordosis) on the neutral lateral view. The mean angular change between flexion and extension lateral radiographs was 5° (range 0°-17°). The mean translation on the neutral lateral view was 6 mm (range 0-15 mm). The mean change in translational between flexion and extension was 2 mm (range 0-11 mm). Twenty patients (7%) exhibited spondylolisthesis only on the flexion view. A significant positive correlation was found between the change in angulation and the change in translation on flexion and extension views (ρ = 0.18, p = 0.001). No significant correlation was found between anterior osteophyte size and mobility with flexion-extension radiographs. CONCLUSIONS The wide range in all radiographic parameters for LDS confirms the heterogeneous nature of this condition and suggests that a grading system to subclassify LDS may be clinically useful. On flexion and extension radiographs, increased translational motion correlated with increased angular motion. Anterior osteophyte size was not found to be predictive of segmental stability. This data set should prove beneficial to those seeking to subcategorize LDS in the future.

[1]  June Ho Lee,et al.  Spinopelvic Alignment After Interspinous Soft Stabilization With a Tension Band System in Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2010, Spine.

[2]  A. Hofman,et al.  The Association Between Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Low Back Pain: The Influence of Age, Gender, and Individual Radiographic Features , 2010, Spine.

[3]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: Prevalence and Association With Low Back Pain in the Adult Community-Based Population , 2009, Spine.

[4]  A. Uchida,et al.  Direction of the formation of anterior lumbar vertebral osteophytes , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[5]  A. Silman,et al.  Lumbar disc degeneration: association between osteophytes, end-plate sclerosis and disc space narrowing , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[7]  A. Silman,et al.  Radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration and self-reported back pain. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[8]  Mark D. Brown,et al.  Intraoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spine Motion Segment Stiffness , 2002, Spine.

[9]  H. Yamada,et al.  Lumbar Sagittal Balance Influences the Clinical Outcome After Decompression and Posterolateral Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2002, Spine.

[10]  V M Haughton,et al.  The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  H. An,et al.  The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[13]  A. Benini [Lumbar spinal stenosis. An overview 50 years following initial description]. , 1993, Der Orthopade.

[14]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  H. Farfan,et al.  Instability of the lumbar spine. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[17]  N. Rosenberg Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.