Testing for quadratic impact of industrial robots on environmental performance and reaction to green technology and environmental cost

[1]  Zhihui Yang,et al.  Can data center green reform facilitate urban green technology innovation? Evidence from China , 2023, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry? , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[3]  J. W. Emerson,et al.  Explaining environmental performance: Insights for progress on sustainability , 2022, Environmental Development.

[4]  Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz,et al.  Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance , 2022, Ecological Economics.

[5]  Yaya Li,et al.  Carbon emission reduction effects of industrial robot applications: Heterogeneity characteristics and influencing mechanisms , 2022, Technology in Society.

[6]  Li Zhang,et al.  Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China's auditing system reform , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[7]  Mehmet Pinar Sensitivity of environmental performance index based on stochastic dominance. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Ling-Yun He,et al.  Robot adoption and energy performance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms , 2022, Energy Economics.

[9]  Hao Li,et al.  ESG and Firm's Default Risk , 2022, Finance Research Letters.

[10]  O. Aluko,et al.  Heterogeneous effects of industrialization on the environment: Evidence from panel quantile regression , 2021, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.

[11]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Assessing the impact of industrial robots on manufacturing energy intensity in 38 countries , 2021, Energy Economics.

[12]  Xian-xing Wu,et al.  Impact of Energy Structure Adjustment and Environmental Regulation on Air Pollution in China: Simulation and Measurement Research by the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model , 2021 .

[13]  D. Hoang,et al.  Economic Sanctions and Environmental Performance: The Moderating Roles of Financial Market Development and Institutional Quality , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[14]  Qiang Wang,et al.  The effects of population aging, life expectancy, unemployment rate, population density, per capita GDP, urbanization on per capita carbon emissions , 2021 .

[15]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Underestimated impact of the COVID-19 on carbon emission reduction in developing countries – A novel assessment based on scenario analysis , 2021, Environmental research.

[16]  John W. Goodell,et al.  ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China , 2021, Finance Research Letters.

[17]  M. Aslam,et al.  The nexus of industrialization, GDP per capita and CO2 emission in China , 2021 .

[18]  Fengsheng Chien,et al.  A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: The role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Yue Wang,et al.  Globalization and environment: Effects of international trade on emission intensity reduction of pollutants causing global and local concerns. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Xuefeng Shao,et al.  Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Hidemichi Fujii,et al.  Artificial intelligence and energy intensity in China’s industrial sector: Effect and transmission channel , 2021, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[22]  Haichao Fan,et al.  Labor costs and the adoption of robots in China , 2021, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[23]  L. Shang,et al.  Environmental regulation, import trade, and green technology innovation , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[24]  George Serafeim,et al.  Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings , 2021, The Accounting Review.

[25]  Masood Fathi,et al.  Industry 4.0 and opportunities for energy sustainability , 2021 .

[26]  Ya-Wen Lei Upgrading China through Automation: Manufacturers, Workers and the Techno-Developmental State , 2021, Work, Employment and Society.

[27]  M. Hafeez,et al.  Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO2 emission , 2021 .

[28]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Asymmetric investigation to track the effect of urbanization, energy utilization, fossil fuel energy and CO2 emission on economic efficiency in China: another outlook , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[29]  Jun Liu,et al.  The effect of artificial intelligence on carbon intensity: Evidence from China's industrial sector , 2021, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

[30]  Rainald Borck,et al.  Population density and urban air quality , 2021, Regional Science and Urban Economics.

[31]  A. C. Marques,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? , 2020 .

[32]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Oil price shocks, geopolitical risks, and green bond market dynamics , 2020 .

[33]  Jin hwa Jung,et al.  Industrial robots, employment growth, and labor cost: A simultaneous equation analysis , 2020 .

[34]  Berkay Özcan,et al.  Robots and the Gender Pay Gap in Europe , 2020, European Economic Review.

[35]  Óscar Afonso,et al.  Directed technical change and environmental quality , 2020 .

[36]  M. Sheng,et al.  Effects of heterogeneous technological progress on haze pollution: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[37]  Tamara Keszey Environmental orientation, sustainable behaviour at the firm-market interface and performance , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[38]  V. Belvedere,et al.  Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. An exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies , 2020 .

[39]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Quantitative assessment of factors affecting energy intensity from sector, region and time perspectives using decomposition method: A case of China’s metallurgical industry , 2019 .

[40]  Carla Gonçalves Machado,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[41]  A. Russell,et al.  Energy and air pollution benefits of household fuel policies in northern China , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis , 2019, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[43]  Nikolaj Malchow-Møller,et al.  Automation and productivity—a cross-country, cross-industry comparison , 2019, Industrial and Corporate Change.

[44]  Inessa Love,et al.  Good for the Environment, Good for Business: Foreign Acquisitions and Energy Intensity , 2019, Journal of International Economics.

[45]  Lucas Santos Dalenogare,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[46]  Bob Rijkers,et al.  Robots, Tasks and Trade , 2018 .

[47]  Hao Yu,et al.  Do Economic Activities Cause Air Pollution? Evidence From China’s Major Cities , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[48]  J. Iqbal,et al.  Adaptive geospatial modeling of soil contamination by selected heavy metals in the industrial area of Sheikhupura, Pakistan , 2018, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[49]  Edward F. Buffie,et al.  Should We Fear the Robot Revolution? (The Correct Answer is Yes) , 2018, Journal of Monetary Economics.

[50]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Demographics and Automation , 2018, The Review of Economic Studies.

[51]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  What cause large regional differences in PM2.5 pollutions in China? Evidence from quantile regression model , 2018 .

[52]  Eva Pongrácz,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of home energy management systems (HEMS) using dynamic emissions factors for electricity in Finland , 2017 .

[53]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth , 2017, The Economics of Artificial Intelligence.

[54]  H. A. Bekhet,et al.  Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: Evidence from the dynamic relationship , 2017 .

[55]  Umesh Bastola,et al.  Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America , 2017 .

[56]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.

[57]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research , 2016 .

[58]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Technological progress and energy rebound effect in China׳s textile industry: Evidence and policy implications , 2016 .

[59]  Rawshan Ara Begum,et al.  Dynamics of energy use, technological innovation, economic growth and trade openness in Malaysia , 2015 .

[60]  Chao Feng,et al.  A performance evaluation of the energy, environmental, and economic efficiency and productivity in China: An application of global data envelopment analysis , 2015 .

[61]  Guy Michaels,et al.  Robots at Work , 2015, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[62]  Jevan Cherniwchan Economic Growth, Industrialization, and the Environment , 2012 .

[63]  Stephen S. Golub,et al.  DEFINING AND MEASURING GREEN FDI: AN EXPLORATORY REVIEW OF EXISTING WORK AND EVIDENCE , 2011 .

[64]  Shinji Kaneko,et al.  Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis , 2010 .

[65]  M. Toffel,et al.  How Firms Respond to Being Rated , 2009 .

[66]  I. Martínez‐Zarzoso The Impact of Urbanization on Co2 Emissions: Evidence from Developing Countries , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  Ann Terlaak,et al.  Order without law? the role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors , 2007 .

[68]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Doing R & D in Countries with Weak IPR Protection : Can Corporate Management Substitute for Legal Institutions ? , 2004 .

[69]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Converting Technology to Mitigate Environmental Damage , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[70]  E. Rosa,et al.  STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts , 2003 .

[71]  A. Marcus,et al.  Introduction to the Special Research Forum on the Management of Organizations in the Natural Environment: A Field Emerging From Multiple Paths, With Many Challenges Ahead , 2000 .

[72]  Vasanthakumar N. Bhat,et al.  Does it pay to be green , 1999 .

[73]  Nancy L. Stokey Are There Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[74]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis , 1997 .

[75]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[76]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[77]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[78]  Usama Awan,et al.  How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth , 2021 .

[79]  Mohd Javaid,et al.  Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation , 2021 .

[80]  Jun Li,et al.  Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact? , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[81]  Kathleen B. Cooper,et al.  Introduction (Extract 1 from The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda) , 2019 .

[82]  Andrew Moffat Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[83]  I. Martínez‐Zarzoso,et al.  The Impact of Urbanization on CO 2 Emissions : Evidence from Developing Countries Summary , 2008 .

[84]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .

[85]  Defining and measuring Green IT , 2022 .