On the Roles of Project, Program and Portfolio Governance

This work proposes a new motivation for a literature review on the concepts of roles in project, program and portfolio governance within organizational overall governance. Recent literature has been promoting a paradigm change in the way how the research and practitioner communities should approach project management. Under such change, it mattered to better understand in a first moment which drivers regarding project, program and portfolio governance roles motivated or, in part, enabled such change. In a second moment the focus was placed on the way how project, program and portfolio governance roles (whereas the concept of role demonstrates to need clarifications under the main standards and practitioners books) are addressed from that paradigm shift onwards. As a result, we concluded that current standards and practitioners books do not promote and effective integration with organizational governance, and although initiatives as Research Project Management promote a shift by addressing a required multidisciplinary approach on project management discipline, such governance alignment is yet to be achieved. The conclusion and final remarks on the future work, stresses onto the evidenced gaps in promoting a coherent set of theories, models and tools in project management discipline, and the apparent suitability of Enterprise Engineering discipline to address them.

[1]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Project studies and engaged scholarship: Directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects , 2016 .

[2]  Hans B. F. Mulder,et al.  The discipline of enterprise engineering , 2013 .

[3]  José M. Tribolet,et al.  The Role of Enterprise Governance and Cartography in Enterprise Engineering , 2014, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[4]  Wang Jin,et al.  Application of Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) to Construction in China: An Empirical Study , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering.

[5]  Gregory Howell,et al.  The Underlying Theory of Project Management Is Obsolete , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Darren Dalcher,et al.  Rethinking project practice: emerging insights from a series of books for practitioners , 2016 .

[7]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Beyond Project Management: New Perspectives on the temporary – permanent dilemma , 2002 .

[8]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Towards a multi-perspective research program on projects and temporary organizations Analyzing the Scandinavian turn and the rethinking effort , 2016 .

[9]  R. Turner,et al.  Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[10]  Martin Op't Land,et al.  Enterprise Architecture - Creating Value by Informed Governance , 2008, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[11]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world , 2015 .

[12]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering , 2009, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[13]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[14]  Per Svejvig,et al.  The Danish Agenda for Rethinking Project Management , 2016 .

[15]  Mark Winter,et al.  Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network , 2006 .

[16]  Janice Thomas,et al.  Rethinking project management – Old truths and new insights. , 2001 .