Memory and Encoding of Spoken Discourse Following Right Hemisphere Damage: Evidence from the Auditory Moving Window (AMW) Technique

We investigated the hypotheses that impaired discourse processing following right hemisphere damage is mediated by task difficulty and is associated with deficits in discourse encoding. Spoken discourse passages differing in contextual predictability were presented to right hemisphere-damaged (RHD) patients and to non-brain-damaged (NBD) controls for subsequent recall using the Auditory Moving Window paradigm. To manipulate processing difficulty, speech segments were of normal or accelerated speech rates. The recall results showed that RHD adults recalled less than NBD controls overall and failed to recall major idea units better than minor idea units for high predictability passages presented at accelerated speech rates. Both RHD patients and NBD controls failed to recall major idea units better than minor idea units for low predictability passages, regardless of speech rate. The encoding results showed that RHD adults were both slower overall and differentially slower than NBD controls when listening to accelerated passage segments. Taken together, the encoding and recall results are consistent with the view that extracting passage gist under difficult listening conditions is especially vulnerable for patients with right hemisphere strokes.

[1]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[2]  H. Brownell,et al.  Discourse Ability and Brain Damage , 1990 .

[3]  A Yamadori,et al.  Comprehension in alexia. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Walter Huber,et al.  Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia , 1982, Brain and Language.

[5]  A Wingfield,et al.  How much and how fast: rapid processing of spoken language in later adulthood. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[6]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[7]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Memorability functions as an indicator of qualitative age differences in text recall. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[8]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  E. B. Coleman,et al.  A set of thirty-six prose passages calibrated for complexity , 1967 .

[10]  A. Basili,et al.  Verbal expression of right cerebrovascular accident patients: Convergent and divergent language , 1987, Brain and Language.

[11]  David Caplan,et al.  The Use of Contextual Information Related to General World Knowledge by Right Brain-Damaged Individuals in Pronoun Resolution , 1997, Brain and Language.

[12]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .

[13]  E. Renzi,et al.  Impairment of Right Brain-Damaged Patients on a Linguistic Cognitive Task , 1981, Cortex.

[14]  F Ferreira,et al.  Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.

[16]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. , 1996 .

[17]  H. Brownell,et al.  The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[18]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Working memory and inference revision in brain-damaged and normally aging adults. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  C. Tompkins,et al.  Redundancy enhances emotional inferencing by right- and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  Emilia Łojek-Osiejuk Knowledge of Scripts Reflected in Discourse of Aphasics and Right-Brain-Damaged Patients , 1996, Brain and Language.

[21]  M. Hough,et al.  Contextual influences in aphasia: Effects of predictive versus nonpredictive narratives , 1989, Brain and Language.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  M. Hough Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization , 1990, Brain and Language.

[24]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[26]  H. Kornhuber,et al.  Observations on regional cerebral blood flow in cortical and subcortical structures during language production in normal man , 1985, Brain and Language.

[27]  R. Pierce,et al.  Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia , 1986, Brain and Language.

[28]  C. Mateer,et al.  Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of implicit attitude , 1985, Brain and Language.

[29]  D. Levine,et al.  Covariant Defects in Visuospatial Abilities and Recall of Verbal Narrative After Right Hemisphere Stroke , 1986, Cortex.

[30]  R. Dixon,et al.  Verbal Ability and Text Structure Effects on Adult Age Differences in Text Recall , 1984 .

[31]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Study of Cerebral Function with Positron Computed Tomography , 1982, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[32]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners , 1984, Brain and Language.

[33]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners , 1984, Brain and Language.

[34]  A Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[35]  David Caplan,et al.  The Use of Contextual Information by Right Brain-Damaged Individuals in the Resolution of Ambiguous Pronouns , 1997, Brain and Language.

[36]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: Effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[37]  M. Beeman Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[38]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[40]  Debra Titone,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Context Sensitivity During Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , 1998, Brain and Language.

[41]  E. Schneiderman,et al.  A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage , 1988, Brain and Language.

[42]  R H Brookshire,et al.  Effects of rate of speech and linguistic stress on auditory paragraph comprehension of aphasic individuals. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[43]  C. Tompkins,et al.  The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  E. Stine-Morrow,et al.  Resource allocation in on-line reading by younger and older adults. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[45]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Time Course of Activating Brain Areas in Generating Verbal Associations , 1997 .

[46]  C. Tompkins Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[47]  J. D. Saddy,et al.  Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[48]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Multiple memory systems in the processing of speech: evidence from aging. , 1995, Experimental aging research.

[49]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[50]  C. Tompkins,et al.  Automatic and effortful processing of emotional intonation after right or left hemisphere brain damage. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[51]  F. Viader,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during comprehension and speech (in cerebrally healthy subjects) , 1989, Brain and Language.

[52]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Rapid speech processing and divided attention: processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[53]  The Validity of the Miller-Coleman Readability Scale. , 1969 .

[54]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Consistency of the effects of rate of speech on brain-damaged adults' comprehension of narrative discourse. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.