Study on carbon capture and storage (CCS) investment decision-making based on real options for China's coal-fired power plants

In this paper, a quadrinomial model based on the theory of real options is developed to evaluate the investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofitting for existing coal-fired power plants in China. Uncertainties in carbon price, fossil fuel price, investment cost and government subsidy are considered. An existing typical 600 MW supercritical pulverized coal-fired (SCPC) plant is taken as a case study to illustrate the proposed model, and the effects of government subsidy under different scenarios on the critical carbon price to invest in CCS are analyzed. The results indicate that the real options approach has an advantage over the application of traditional net present value (NPV) method when handling uncertainty. And government subsidy has significant effects on reducing critical carbon price for investment in CCS. The critical carbon prices are 103.56 RMB/ton with 100% subsidy and 217.95 RMB/ton without subsidy, while the current average carbon price is 85.2 RMB/ton. This means that the current trading environment is not positive enough to attract investment in CCS retrofitting. These conclusions provide theoretical foundation for decision-making of CCS investment and related policy-making.

[1]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Stochastic MILP model for optimal timing of investments in CO2 capture technologies under uncertainty in prices , 2013 .

[2]  M. Zhang,et al.  A real option model for renewable energy policy evaluation with application to solar PV power generation in China , 2014 .

[3]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments , 2008 .

[4]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  The complex future of CO2 capture and storage: Variable electricity generation and fossil fuel power , 2013 .

[5]  Luke Reedman,et al.  Using a Real-Options Approach to Model Technology Adoption Under Carbon Price Uncertainty: An Application to the Australian Electricity Generation Sector , 2006 .

[6]  Margarethe Rammerstorfer,et al.  Carbon capture and storage—Investment strategies for the future? , 2011 .

[7]  Robert T. Dahowski,et al.  A $70/tCO2 greenhouse gas mitigation backstop for China's industrial and electric power sectors: Insights from a comprehensive CCS cost curve , 2012 .

[8]  L. Shih,et al.  Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model — The case of Taiwan , 2010 .

[9]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Modelling the investment in carbon capture retrofits of pulverized coal-fired plants , 2013 .

[10]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture , 2007 .

[11]  Power Producer's Carbon Capture Investment Timing under Price and Technology Uncertainties , 2011 .

[12]  Yanpeng Cai,et al.  Evaluating China's biomass power production investment based on a policy benefit real options model , 2014 .

[13]  Zhang Jin-suo.  The empirical study on variable models of coal price in China , 2010 .

[14]  Jiajun Chen,et al.  A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties , 2014 .

[15]  Ying Li,et al.  The implications of CO2 price for China’s power sector decarbonization , 2015 .

[16]  Wenji Zhou,et al.  Uncertainty modeling of CCS investment strategy in China’s power sector , 2010 .

[17]  Lei Zhu,et al.  CO2 mitigation potential of CCS in China – an evaluation based on an integrated assessment model , 2015 .

[18]  Evaluating coal bed methane investment in China based on a real options model , 2013 .

[19]  D. Reiner,et al.  Assessing the value of CO2 capture ready in new-build pulverised coal-fired power plants in China , 2009 .

[20]  Lei Zhu,et al.  A real options–based CCS investment evaluation model: Case study of China’s power generation sector , 2011 .

[21]  Afzal Siddiqui,et al.  Real options analysis of investment in carbon capture and sequestration technology , 2012, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[22]  D. Bunn,et al.  Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy , 2008 .

[23]  S. Fuss,et al.  Fuel price and technological uncertainty in a real options model for electricity planning , 2010 .

[24]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[25]  Paulo Picchetti,et al.  Geometric Brownian Motion and structural breaks in oil prices: A quantitative analysis , 2006 .